Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Bicycling

Last Legislative Update: What Bills Were Signed, Vetoed, or Never Got that Far

Bikes parked in front of the California State Capitol building in Sacramento
Note: GJEL Accident Attorneys regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog California. Unless noted in the story, GJEL Accident Attorneys is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.

The California 2021-22 legislative session is over, and all the bills have either been signed yesor vetoed no. Governor Newsom signed 997 bills and vetoed 169 of them - which, said the governor in a press release, "saved the state billions in taxpayer dollars."

Below is an update on bills related to bicycle and pedestrian safety, public transit, and climate that Streetsblog has been tracking, including a recap of some of the ones that never got to the governor - those are marked Screen Shot 2022-10-03 at 1.40.09 PM.

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION & TRAFFIC SAFETY

yes Safe Street Crossings: A.B. 2147, Assemblymember Phil Ting. The "Freedom to Walk" act does not fully decriminalize "jaywalking," despite the what the click-bait headlines say - but it does prohibit police from giving people tickets for crossing where it is obviously safe to do so, even without the "safety" of a painted crosswalk.

yes Bicycle Omnibus: A.B. 1909, Assemblymember Laura Friedman. Prohibits mandatory bike registration requirements, requires drivers to change lanes if possible when passing bikes, clarifies that bikes are allowed to cross with a pedestrian “walk” signal, and prevents cities from prohibiting e-bikes in bike lanes.

yes Pedestrian Head Start: A.B. 2264, Assemblymember Richard Bloom. Requires Caltrans and cities to update all pedestrian control signals to give pedestrians a head start at intersections.

yes CEQA Exemptions for Bike, Ped, Transit Projects: S.B. 922, Senator Scott Wiener. Extends existing exemptions under state environmental law for projects that clearly have minimal environmental impact, as long as they don’t include capacity increases for cars.

no E-bike Incentive Program: A.B. 117, Assemblymember Tasha Boerner Horvath. Would have made the e-bike incentive program permanent and eligible for ongoing funding, similar to several programs for electric cars. Last year’s state budget set aside $10 million to create the e-bike incentive programwhich is still being formulated – and vetoing this bill threatens to make it a one-time-only opportunity for a few people.

yes The "Kill Bike-Share Bill": A.B. 371, Assemblymember Jones-Sawyer. CalBike argued strongly that this bill, which imposes extreme insurance requirements on shared scooter companies beyond what is required for private car owners, sets a dangerous precedent and could bring an end to scooter- and bike-share in California.

yes Speed Limits: A.B. 1938, Friedman. Further loosens the 85th percentile rule used to set speed limits by allowing cities to round speed limits down. It also exempts local speed limits that are lowered within this new rule from the definition of “speed trap,” thus guaranteeing they are enforceable.

no Tax Breaks for Living Car-Light: S.B. 457, Senator Anthony Portantino. Would have offered a tax break of $1000 to lower-income households that don't own cars.

yes Traffic Calming and Active Transportation Plans: S.B. 932, Portantino. Requires cities to incorporate the Safe System – aka Vision Zero – principles within their general plans.

Screen Shot 2022-10-03 at 1.40.09 PM Stop-as-Yield: Assemblymember Tasha Boerner Horvath pulled A.B. 1713 before it was sent to the governor when he indicated that he would have vetoed it.

Screen Shot 2022-10-03 at 1.40.09 PM Speed Cameras: A.B. 2336, Friedman and Ting. Would have created a pilot program to deploy speed cameras in specific cities on high-injury corridors, with strict rules about how citations would be issued and where any fines would go.

yes Electric Bicycle Safety and Training Program: A.B. 1946, Boerner Horvath. Requires the CHP to develop a statewide safety and training program for e-bike riders "to be posted on the CHP website."

no Safety Courses for TNC Drivers: A.B. 2716, Assemblymember Tim Grayson. Newsom called this attempt to require Uber, Lyft, and other TNC drivers to complete a safety course "redundant."

PUBLIC TRANSIT

no Youth Pass Pilot: A.B. 1919, Assemblymember Chris Holden. This would have created a statewide pilot to provide grants to transit agencies so they can provide free transit for youth. "Too much money," according to Newsom.

yes Existing Free and Reduced Fare Programs: S.B. 942, Senator Josh Newman. Eliminates a requirement that a transit agency prove that continuing an existing fare-free program would reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Screen Shot 2022-10-03 at 1.40.09 PM Coordinating Bay Area Transit Agencies: S.B. 917, Senator Josh Becker. This would have required the 27 different Bay Area transit agencies to collaborate on making transit a seamless experience for riders, including consistent fares and transfer payments, standardized mapping and signage, and open data systems.

Screen Shot 2022-10-03 at 1.40.09 PM Faster Bus Service on the Bay Bridge: A.B. 455, Assemblymember Buffy Wicks. Would have required MTC to establish speed and reliability performance targets for buses on the clogged Bay Bridge, and to suggest strategies for reaching them.

yes Transit Fare for Jury Duty: A.B. 1981, Assemblymember Alex Lee. Allows jurors to be reimbursed for using public transportation and creates a pilot program to increase juror compensation.

CLIMATE

no Align Transportation Funding with Climate Goals: A.B. 2438, Friedman. Would have required state and locally funded transportation projects to help meet goals of the California Transportation Plan (CTP) and the Climate Action Plan for Transportation Infrastructure (CAPTI), in keeping with legislative reports on how most of California's transportation funding undermines its climate work.

yes No Parking Minimums Near Transit: A.B. 2097, Friedman. Prohibits cities from imposing any minimum parking requirements on projects close to quality transit stops/stations.

yes Parking Cash-Out: A.B. 2206, Lee. Beefs up requirements that employers who provide free parking offer a similar cash subsidy to employees who choose not to drive to work.

yes Buffer Zones Around Oil Wells: S.B. 1137, Senator Lena Gonzalez. Defines “health protection zones” as 3,200 feet surrounding oil wells and prohibits new wells within that distance of “sensitive uses,” including schools, hospitals, and housing. In 2024, existing oil wells would have to comply with stricter rules on emissions, venting, noise, public notice, and chemical analysis of water.

yes The California Climate Crisis Act: A.B. 1279, Assemblymembers Al Muratsuchi and Cristina Garcia. Sets a higher and more urgent target for eliminating greenhouse gas emissions in California, specifically aiming for “net zero ghg emissions as soon as possible, but no later than 2045.”

Screen Shot 2022-10-03 at 1.40.09 PM Climate Corporate Accountability Act: S.B. 260, Senator Scott Wiener. This failed on the Assembly floor by one vote. It would simply have required large corporations in California to publicly disclose their carbon footprint.

Screen Shot 2022-10-03 at 1.40.09 PM No New Freeways Through Disadvantaged Communities: A.B. 1778, Cristina Garcia. Would have prohibited Caltrans from spending money on freeway widening projects through communities impacted by pollution and displacement. It was killed in the Senate Transportation Committee.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Thursday’s Headlines

After electrification, Caltrain ridership soars; California High School Transit alliance forms; The story of Monterey County's Surf! BRT; More

November 21, 2024

SGV Connect 130 – Streetsblog Editors Recap the 2024 Election

The post-election special features a pair of Streetsblog editors, Joe Linton of Streetsblog L.A. and Melanie Curry of Streetsblog California, joining Damien Newton and Chris Greenspon.

November 21, 2024

Metro Committee Approves Revoking $435K Culver City Grant due to Bike Lane Removal

Culver City recently removed protected bike lanes funded by a Metro Active Transportation grant, now Metro wants its money back

November 21, 2024

Opinion: Why I’m Hopeful About Vision Zero, Even Post-Election

"We all know that change is hard, especially at a time when the nation seems so divided. But keeping our loved ones safe is a universal goal."

November 21, 2024

One Hidden Reason Why Your State DOT Isn’t Building Protected Bike Lanes

"Proven safety countermeasures" might sound like a wonky engineering term, but it could hold the key to unlocking money to save lives.

November 21, 2024
See all posts