Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Bicycling

Caltrans to Report on Achievements from Statewide Bike and Pedestrian Plan

Note: GJEL Accident Attorneys regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog California. Unless noted in the story, GJEL Accident Attorneys is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.

One of the agenda items at last week's California Transportation Commission meeting was a brief update on progress being made to meet the goals of the Statewide Bike and Pedestrian Plan.

Caltrans' Division Chief of Transportation Planning Marlon Flournoy and his team are working on a progress report on the department's 2017 plan, "Towards an Active California." That plan was a compendium of potential policies and measures that could lead to increased biking and walking while reducing fatalities among vulnerable road users. It was Caltrans' first serious attempt at naming priorities, defining performance measures, and setting out intermediary goals towards those ends.

A lot has changed since the plan was released. Concern about climate change deepened, as have horrific increases in traffic fatalities. Both of these issues are reflected in a heightened interest at the state level in planning and building safe infrastructure for people not in cars. The work is (very) far from done, but this draft progress report is a first documentation of progress being made.

It outlines where the state has made progress on the plan's main goals and objectives, including safety, mobility, preservation, and social equity. Much of the progress it describes is still in the baby step stage. For example, all twelve districts have completed an Active Transportation Plan; Caltrans officially adopted a "Safe Systems Approach" and developed a toolbox of pedestrian safety "counter measures," presumably meaning they must counteract existing car-centric (still being built) infrastructure that puts pedestrians in danger.

The progress report also outlines current and future actions in its various areas of concern, including education on traffic safety (sorely lacking!), design, creating connected networks and improving multimodal access.

It's both overwhelming - there are so many areas being worked on - and underwhelming - there is so much more work that needs doing. Caltrans is still gathering input for the report, and seeking information from agencies and organizations who have achieved some success or are currently working on projects - or are planning to do so.

Presumably failures and feedback on areas that need improvement would also be useful in this progress report. One of the bits of information the team says it wants is information about policy, equity, and climate topics that are missing and should be included when the Statewide Bike and Pedestrian Plan itself is updated.

More information, and the draft report, can be found here. On Friday, December 16, at 10:30 a.m., Caltrans staff will host a public webinar to discuss the report, talk about the data that has been gathered so far, and highlight some of the progress made.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Sudden State Funding Freeze Leaves Transit Agencies Hanging

Transit agencies were caught off guard by a 60-day funding freeze announced on the day they were expecting the allocations

May 3, 2024

Friday Video: How to Make Places Safe For Non-Drivers After Dark

A top Paris pedestrian planner, a leading GIS professional, and Streetsblog's own Kea Wilson weigh in on the roots of America's nighttime road safety crisis, and the strategies that can help end it.

May 3, 2024

LAPD Was Crossing Against Red Light in Crash that Killed Pedestrian and Injured Six in Hollywood

The department says the officers had turned on their lights and sirens just before crossing. Their reasons for doing so remain unknown.

May 3, 2024

Wider Highways Don’t Solve Congestion. So Why Are We Still Knocking Down Homes for Them?

Highway expansion projects certainly qualify as projects for public use. But do they deliver a public benefit that justifies taking private property?

May 3, 2024
See all posts