Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Caltrans

California Transportation Commission Relents, Adds Complete Streets Requirements to Funding Program Guidelines

The State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP), the state's largest highway funding program, makes some moves to include S.B. 960 requirements

There’s no question why few people ride a bike on this incomplete street

One of the items on the California Transportation Commission's agenda last week was adoption of guidelines for the State Highway Operations and Protection Program, one of the state's largest funding programs for transportation. Commission staff had presented a draft of the guidelines at the October meeting, and planned to adopt them this month.

Advocates and others pointed out that the update should incorporate S.B. 960, a new law signed by Governor Newsom in September that requires Caltrans to plan for and include accommodations for safe walking and biking on its projects.

Streetsblog California wrote at the time that CTC staff said they were not going to include any information about S.B. 960 in this guidelines update, even though advocates had been reminding them since spring [PDF] that the law was likely to pass and would need to be dealt with [PDF].

But in the month or so since that meeting, something shifted. Maybe it was a letter Senator Scott Wiener, the author of S.B. 960, wrote to the Commission. At any rate, staff changed their minds and found a way to follow the advice they were getting from climate and sustainable transportation advocates.

The matter is urgent. Next year's SHOPP funding cycle is already being planned, and projects take a long time to go through planning and funding cycles. Meanwhile, SHOPP guidelines are updated only irregularly, with no strict deadline. Years could pass S.B. 960 requirements were included.

At last week's meeting, CTC staff said they added language in specific sections to "ensure the inclusion of… S.B. 960 requirements into the SHOPP processes." One section now clearly states that bicycle and pedestrian projects, in addition to other safety improvements, are eligible for SHOPP funds. And they added clarification about when and how SHOPP funds can be applied when a project uses multiple sources of funding. SHOPP funds are only allowed to be used for "maintenance, safety, operation, and rehabilitation of state highways and bridges that do not add a new traffic lane to the system," so if SHOPP funds are combined with other funding sources, say on a project that adds highway capacity, there has to be transparency about which program pays for what.

One section of the guidelines now reads: "to the extent possible and cost-effective, and where feasible, Caltrans shall… incorporate complete street elements, including, but not limited to, elements that improve the quality of bicycle and pedestrian facilities and that improve safety for all users of
transportation facilities." And in accordance with S.B. 960, it goes on to clarify how exceptions can be made: "If the Department decides not to include complete streets facilities in a manner consistent with the Department’s guidance, the justification for that decision shall be posted on the Department’s public internet website."

Another section adds that the State Highway System Management Plan "shall include specific quantifiable accomplishments, goals, objectives, costs, and performance measures for complete streets and transit priority facilities" and that "Caltrans shall incorporate Climate Action Plan for Transportation Infrastructure (CAPTI) strategies as well as the Caltrans Equity Statement in the development and implementation of the State Highway System Management Plan to the maximum extent feasible while meeting the legal, statutory, and operational requirements of the State Highway System."

Caltrans' quarterly reports to the Commission on SHOPP projects shall also include "a description of complete streets facilities, including pedestrian, bicycle, and transit priority facilities, on each project, including the number, extent, cost, and type of the facilities."

While it's not clear why there was resistance at first, this is a win. Complete streets are now part of the state's highway maintenance funding guidelines. The battle to get good projects built will likely continue on a project-by-project basis, but Caltrans and other agencies will have a harder time ignoring the need for them.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Wednesday’s Headlines

In the south part of the state, they passed a great mobility plan. In the north part, they're fuming about Newsom's Return to Work order.

April 23, 2025

Freeway Updates: 91 Widening, Repave 405, and 105 Safety Fixes

A Metro/Caltrans 91 Freeway expansion project is on hold. Caltrans 105/Studebaker safety enhancements are complete. Caltrans is planning $144M worth of repaving and upgrading for the 405 through the Sepulveda Pass.

April 22, 2025

Advocates Pop-Up Safety on 9th Street in Berkeley

Bike East Bay and other volunteers help show neighbors how much nicer a street can be without cars screaming back and forth

April 22, 2025

Sacramento Is the First in the Nation to Use Bus Mounted Cameras/AI to Keep Bike Lanes Free of Cars

For now, motorists violating the bike lane will only receive warnings. On June 13, the warnings will end and tickets will be given.

April 22, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines

Happy Earth Day!

April 22, 2025
See all posts