Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Advocacy

Actions to Take Today Help Transit Survive the Pandemic

Note: GJEL Accident Attorneys regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog California. Unless noted in the story, GJEL Accident Attorneys is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.

Transit agencies and transit supporters have been calling for help to weather the existential crisis they are facing. A group of advocate organizations hosted a panel discussion today that drove home the urgency of finding more funding, and why action needs to be taken now.

They also suggested several urgent actions that people can take.

CTA has issued a call to Congress for $32 billion in aid nationwide, with $3.1 billion of that for California's many transit agencies, both rural and urban. That, said Michael Pimentel, is the minimum baseline amount needed to prevent transit in the state from collapsing entirely.

Panelists spoke of the people who rely most on transit, and who currently are the ones still riding it, while those who can are sheltering at home. As Beth Osborne of Transportation for America put it, transit is not simply a necessity for the people who rely on it directly. Everyone needs essential workers - from health care workers to grocery clerks to farmworkers - to be able to get to work, so all of us are in reality "transit dependent."

As a society, if we choose to ignore the most vulnerable among us, we are choosing to continue a history of racial, environmental, climate, and social injustice.

Right now, Congress is considering a relief bill that could include more funding for transit. Maybe. While there has been growing support for the call for emergency funding, representatives need to hear from constituents. Panelist Ike Irby, of Senator Kamala Harris's office, urged people to call or email Harris's office and share their personal stories about why transit matters to them. While California Senators Harris and Dianne Feinstein both support the call for transit funding, calls and emails help them make their case.

The panel organizers - TransForm, ClimatePlan, Dream Corps Green for All, Seamless Bay Area, Friends of Caltrain, and Urban Environmentalists - are also collecting signatures from organizations around the state to add to a letter to Harris and Feinstein outlining the issues and supporting the emergency funding.

Another requested action is to sign RideSafe's petition to protect transit workers, who are still struggling to say safe while providing essential services.

The transit crisis has been bad, and it is about to hit a "second wave" of problems, according to Pimentel, stemming from the quadruple threat of low ridership, the drop in sales tax revenue as people stay home and commerce drops, fares being waived in an attempt to keep drivers and riders safe, and increased operating costs associated with new sanitation protocols. And this is after steep cuts in services having already been made. Many agencies are considering even deeper cuts as they try to negotiate an uncertain future.

Many Californians are in dire straits right now. But the potential loss of transit would bring further, widespread difficulties, including unknown economic impacts that could make recovery from the pandemic even harder for everyone.

"How do people not realize that transit is essential?" asked Tamika Butler, one of the panelists. "We can't talk about economic mobility without talking about mobility. We can't talk about health without talking about access to health services."

"We celebrate essential workers as heroes one day," she said, "but the next day we will cut them off from access to what they need."

Other panelists reiterated the basic essential nature of transit itself, and emphasized its importance to the economy, not being merely an amenity for a portion of the population. Pimentel called it a moral imperative to provide basic access to work, to healthcare, and to food. If transit were to die, millions of people would lose the ability to access most basic human needs.

As Osborne put it, "Emergencies push us to do things we probably should have already been doing."

"This is not just about getting back to normal," said Butler. "The old normal sucked. We need leaders who are willing to push us to new boundaries of what transit means. It's a necessity, not an amenity."

You can watch a recording of the panel here.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

CAHSRA Releases Environmental Documents for LA to Anaheim

The 30-mile project section runs from LAUS to ARTIC and would follow an existing passenger and freight rail corridor, passing through parts of Los Angeles County and several Orange and Los Angeles County cities including Vernon, Commerce, Pico Rivera, Norwalk, Buena Park, Fullerton, and Anaheim.

December 5, 2025

Friday’s Headlines

LA is flunking Vision Zero, but what's happening at other parts of the state?

December 5, 2025

Friday Video: Exactly Why the Cybertruck Sucks

Unwind and let yourself hate on Elon Musk a little.

December 4, 2025

California Awards More Than $140 Million of Federal Funds for Local Road-Safety Programs

The projects are aimed at supporting the governor's modest goal of reducing traffic deaths by 30% in a decade.

December 4, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines

I have a great idea on how LA can improve its crumbling infrastructure...

December 4, 2025

Talking Headways Podcast: The (Parking) Reformation

Tony Jordan, president of the Parking Reform Network, discusses getting rid of our cars, parking policy, and Donald Shoup’s legacy.

December 4, 2025
See all posts