Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Bicycling

Reducing the Role of Police in Traffic Enforcement Could Increase Safety for Everyone

As calls to "defund the police" grow louder across the country, the California Bicycle Coalition has posted an excellent discussion of the issue, including a list of recommended policies. These policies, which include ways to shrink existing police departments while maintaining public safety and offering more resources to distressed communities, could dramatically change the way cities think about public safety.

Most activists that have rallied behind calls to Defund the Police are not calling for the total abolishment of police departments, and traffic safety advocates are no exception. Instead, Calbike calls for redirecting police budgets towards people doing the community work that helps prevent problems in the first place, such as social workers, homeless advocates, and healthcare providers.

CalBike reiterates that traffic stops are where most people are likely to come into contact with the police, and that data from police departments throughout the nation show large racial disparities in traffic stops and in police use of force. One analysis found that police were more likely to use force against unarmed Black people and much more likely to kill Black people who aren’t resisting arrest.

The racial profiling in traffic stops includes people on bikes and on foot. Bike East Bay compiled the numbers in the chart below, about stops in the city of Oakland

OaklandPoliceStopsbyBEB
Data compiled by Bike East Bay
Data compiled by Bike East Bay

Writes CalBike:

No one should be harassed for biking or walking while Black. No one should be threatened with police violence for using shared public space. Enforcement of traffic laws by armed police is not working to create safe streets. In fact, it is downright dangerous to Black, indigenous, and people of color.

CalBike offers six recommendations to help guide state policy changes that, they say, will shift traffic enforcement in an anti-racist direction. They are:

    • Redirect funding from the California Highway Patrol budget to street redesign. That is, invest in street design - like protected bike lanes - that can be "self-enforcing."

While infrastructure changes have a high up-front cost, they are much less expensive over time than policing. Safer infrastructure is operational 24/7 and doesn’t require staffing. Better yet, protected bike lanes and intersections have no racial bias – they are equally safe for everyone.

Studies show that automated speed cameras can reduce speeds by up to fifteen percent and serious car crashes by up to 44 percent.

Traffic enforcement should target the vehicles that cause the most harm: cars and trucks. In addition, people who walk and bike have to contend with a hostile built environment that often doesn’t serve them. What the police see as violations are often merely bike riders making their best choices about how to get around on poorly designed streets.

    • Decriminalize biking and walking. Unnecessary enforcement actions that do little to increase public safety include ticketing bicyclists for running stop signs, citing - and arresting - people for jaywalking, and ticketing youth for riding a bike without a helmet.
    • Make public transportation, including bike and scooter share, free.

Tickets for fare evasion are most likely to be given to the people who have the least means to pay. Transit police often target Black riders for extra scrutiny... The money saved on transit policing will help make free transit more affordable.

    • Implement income-adjusted traffic fines.

A $200 red-light ticket could take food off the table of a minimum wage worker, but amount to spare change for a wealthy person. Traffic fines reinforce cycles of poverty and discrimination, often leading to harsher penalties and late fees for poor people who can’t afford to pay. No one should go hungry or go to jail because of a traffic violation.

CalBike is claiming no credit for creating these policy recommendations, but is committing to working on them. The recommendations are based on years of work done by community leaders and activists, including Black and brown urbanists like Tamika Butler, who have been speaking out about racism in planning and policing for years.

See CalBike's post here.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Transform : Traffic Congestion Is a Housing and Transit Problem, Not a Highway Problem

Even the smartest engineer will come up with the wrong answer when they start with the wrong assumptions.

October 23, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines

If the Mayor of San Francisco really got Trump to call off ICE raids, maybe we could all borrow the transcript?

October 23, 2025

PROWAG Passed. Now What?

"Even though we do not yet have a set of comprehensive federally enforceable rules telling us how to make our streets and sidewalks accessible, there is still lots of work to do."

October 22, 2025

Culver City Cuts Ribbon to Open Robertson Blvd Bus/Bike Facility

This morning Culver City officially opened its Robertson Boulevard Complete Street project. Culver City Mayor Dan O’Brien cut the ceremonial ribbon before a crowd of about 60. Culver City’s Chief Transportation Officer, Diana Chang, spoke about how Robertson is now “safer for everyone” and how the project demonstrates the city’s commitment to multimodal mobility, safety,…

October 22, 2025

StreetSmart 11: Exploring Fire Department Tensions in the “War for Street Space”

Why are some fire departments blocking safer street designs? On this week’s StreetSmart Podcast, Damien Newton talks with UC Berkeley’s Zach Lamb about his new report on the tensions shaping the “war for street space.”

October 22, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines

Sometimes my other duties for Streetsblog get me off to a later start for SBCAL than I'd like. Sorry!

October 22, 2025
See all posts