Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Log In
LA Metro

Court Sides With Metro on Beverly Hills Subway Lawsuit, Again

10:46 AM PDT on May 19, 2020

This article supported by Los Angeles Bicycle Attorney as part of a general sponsorship package. All opinions in the article are that of the author, and do not necessarily reflect those of LABA. Click on the ad for more information.

For years, Beverly Hills interests - primarly the Beverly Hills Unified School District (BHUSD) - have been suing against Metro tunnelling to extend the Purple Line subway westward. Today, Judge George H. Wu sided with Metro in ruling on a BHUSD lawsuit against the Federal Transit Administration and Metro.

Metro is currently extending the Westside Purple (now D) Line westward in three sections primarly under Wilshire Boulevard:

    • Section One: Currently about 60 percent complete, WPLE1 will extend from the current Wilshire/Western Avenue terminus to La Cienega Boulevard.
    • Section Two: Currently about 30 percent complete, WPLE2 will extend from La Cienega to Century City.
    • Section Three: Currently about 10 percent complete, WPLE3 will extend from Century City to the Westwood VA Hospital.

Section Two is the primary point of contention, as the so-called "Purple Threat" tunnel goes underneath Beverly Hills High School.

BHUSD's lawsuit charges that Metro's choice of Century City staging areas was not supported by its environmental documentation (its Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement - SEIS.) That there is a supplemental EIS is due to an earlier Beverly Hills lawsuit where Judge Wu mandated that Metro more fully document the factors that led to its final subway alignment. Wu's ruling notes that, under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Metro is required to explain why it chose one alternative over another (one staging area over an alternative staging area) and that Metro "satisfied the obligation and that their determination was not arbitrary or capricious." The court does not rule on whether chosing one alternative is "right"; it ensures that the selection process is thorough and documented - as Metro's was.

In a connected ruling, Wu turned down BHUSD's request that Metro pay $1 million for the district's attorney’s fees and costs, stating that Metro had not acted in bad faith.

BHUSD has spent more than $15 million in school bond funding fighting Metro in the courts. The school district has little to show for this expenditure, but will likely keep adding to this total by appealing today's decision.

BHUSD does not have a lot of time to force any changes to the tunnel alignment. In April 2020, Metro's initial section two tunnel boring machine started digging eastward from Century City. The TBM will likely be boring under the high school any day now.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Caltrans Readies Guidance for Complete Streets, with a Big Exemption

But somewhere along the way, highway interchanges - roads crossing and going under and over freeways and highways - were exempted from the guidelines

September 29, 2023

Guest Opinion: Ten Years In, CA Active Transportation Program Lays Bare a Tale of Two Agencies

L.A. County needs to embrace physically-protected bikeways, robust traffic calming around schools, and similarly transformative, safety-focused projects

September 29, 2023

Commentary: Let’s Talk About the Real “Fatal Flaw” on Valencia

How many people have to die before professional advocates stop endorsing the Valencia Street "experiment" on people?

September 29, 2023

Friday’s Headlines

Caltrans, we need complete streets everywhere, including at freeway interchanges (or maybe especially there); Public agencies and academics join forces to develop AV standards; Republicans really want to suspend the gas tax; More

September 29, 2023
See all posts