Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Cap-and-Trade

Workshops Will Help Define Which Communities Get Cap-and-Trade Funds

Attendees at previous workshops on CalEnviroScreen grapple with how to define a “disadvantaged community.” Photo: Melanie Curry/Streetsblog

Several public meetings will be held around the state this week to discuss cap-and-trade investments in disadvantaged communities. The California Environmental Protection Agency and the Air Resources Board will host the public meetings starting tonight in Fresno. See below for times and dates, plus webinar details for those who can't travel to the workshop sites.

Two issues will be addressed at the meetings. The first one is how to define disadvantaged communities that by law receive a certain portion of proceeds from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. Over the last few years, the state developed a tool to identify which communities qualify as “disadvantaged.” There have been many questions raised about whether the tool, CalEnviroScreen, does a good enough job. The state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment continues to refine it, and recently released an updated version.

CalEnviroScreen ranks communities based on a wide range of factors, including comparative pollution burdens—for example, location near a source of emissions—as well as population characteristics like income and health indicators that make it harder for residents to deal with pollution. Whether those factors are the right ones, and whether they are weighted correctly, has been the subject of ongoing discussions over the last several years.

Another issue to be discussed at the meetings is how project benefits will be assessed. Under A.B. 1550, at least five percent of GGRF funds have to be invested in projects that benefit low-income households or communities, and another five percent in projects that benefit low-income households near communities defined as “disadvantaged” per CalEnviroScreen. But how does one define a benefit to a community? Is it enough, for example, to replace a diesel bus with an electric bus on a line that drives past a disadvantaged community on a nearby freeway, thus reducing local emissions? Or does that electric bus need to directly serve the community with a stop? These questions have been grappled with at other meetings, but there is more grappling to be done.

Comments received at these public meetings will be used by the Air Resources Board to inform its updated funding guidelines for all programs that receive money from the GGRF, from High-Speed Rail to the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities program. Over a dozen agencies administer these programs, following the ARB guidelines.

The meetings will be held at the following times:

    • Fresno6 to 8 p.m. TONIGHT, Wednesday, February 1Cecil C. Hinton Community Center2385 S. Fairview Avenue
    • Los Angeles6 to 8 p.m. TOMORROW, Thursday, February 2Junipero Serra Building320 W. 4th Street
    • Oakland6 to 8 p.m. Monday, February 6Elihu Harris Building1515 Clay Street

In addition, on Tuesday, February 7, from 2 to 4 p.m., there will be a webinar on the same subject. Access the webinar here.

Another opportunity to learn about and weigh in on cap-and-trade is happening next week, with a public workshop on the Air Resources Board's draft plan to meet the state's new 2030 greenhouse gas reduction targets. The scoping plan has had several rounds of workshops already, but an updated draft, The Proposed Plan for Achieving California’s 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target is now available. There is still time to comment before the final plan is released in March.

That workshop will be held in Sacramento on Thursday, February 9, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., and will also be webcast at the same time here. More information and materials for the workshop can be found here. Submit comments on the scoping plan here.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Tuesday’s Headlines

The outlook for Bay Area transit; San Jose's transit agency supports communities near its stations; Which is better - green subsidies or pollution taxes? More

November 19, 2024

The Emissions Data GOP Pols Don’t Want Americans To See

Dozens of red states sued to stop the release of their state transportation emissions data. A new report gives a glimpse into what they were trying to hide.

November 19, 2024

Three Ways to Reimagine Streets for Kids

A Brooklyn school teacher took a trip abroad to see how cities are rethinking streets for students — and took some great ideas home as a souvenir.

November 19, 2024

Reasons for Hope at this Year’s World Day of Remembrance

With no tangible improvements in the Vision Zero stats, many advocates express hope that a new mayoral administration and board of supervisors could finally start making streets safer

November 19, 2024
See all posts