Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Streetsblog USA

Why One Street Safety Advocate Will Never Go to a DOT Meeting Again

1:05 PM PST on March 1, 2016

Residents in Saint Paul devoted devoted hundreds of hours to developing this multi-modal plan for Snelling Avenue, only to have huge portions of it thrown out without notice or explanation. Image: Streets.mn
Residents in Saint Paul worked with Minnesota DOT to include safety improvements for biking and walking in this plan for Snelling Avenue, only to have huge portions of it thrown out without notice or explanation. Image: Streets.mn

Public meetings hosted by state DOTs can be very frustrating. People who want safer streets and take the time to attend are often deluged with highly technical excuses about why their suggestions won't fly.

Andy Singer at Streets.mn, known for his excellent cartoon work, says he's done for good. He's never attending another Minnesota DOT meeting after devoting "at least 100 hours" to what was supposed to be a "multi-modal" plan for Saint Paul's Snelling Avenue -- one of the most dangerous corridors in the Twin Cities region.

Real design improvements came out of the workshops -- at first. Then Singer says his faith in the process was betrayed when the state DOT ditched large portions of the plan with no explanation or notice:

A plan is a promise from a government agency that it is going to do certain things for the community. I and other community members invested thousands of hours of our time in a good-faith effort to come up with the Multi-Modal Plan. By throwing out large portions of it, MnDOT wasted our time, betrayed our trust, and wasted public money.

As they’ve been doing for over seventy years, MnDOT demonstrated that they simply don’t care about public opinion or the communities through which their enormously destructive highways pass. They constantly solicit public feedback for plans like this, or for “Minnesota Go”, or their statewide bike/pedestrian plans. In fact, it seems like their bike/ped division has done nothing for the last twenty years except draft plans that are never implemented.

We sit in rooms with facilitators and stick post-it notes on maps, or watch presentations about "how much the agency cares about our input," and break into meaningless little discussion groups. In retrospect, it all appears to have been a waste of time, and I will never go to a meeting with MnDOT again. It’s like when politicians appoint a “Blue Ribbon Panel” and then ignore its recommendations. After a few of these, people stop participating because they realize it’s pointless.

Elsewhere on the Network today: The City Fix shares research about the effect of Bogotá’s TransMilenio BRT on public health. And Cyclelicious reports that Oklahoma is considering "Idaho Stop"-style legislation.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Monday’s Headlines

People fight over bike lanes but come around in the end; Drivers getting more distracted; CalEnviroScreen is "flawed"; More

February 26, 2024

Should Communities That Suppress Housing Lose Their Road Funding?

A Colorado bill would require sprawling cities to take action to increase their affordable housing supply before they collect money to build more roads — and some want to take it national.

February 26, 2024

Metro and Caltrans Quietly Canceled 110 Freeway Expansion Project

The 110 Freeway Adams Terminus Improvement Project would have extended a 2000+foot long ramp from below 28th Street to Figueroa Street near USC

February 23, 2024
See all posts