Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Active Transportation Program

How Bad Is Newsom’s Proposed Cut to the Active Transportation Program? Awful.

It would have zeroed out the entirety of Cycle 7 - but the legislature has rejected the cuts.

Image: Rémi Jouan via Wikimedia Commons

Update, Wednesday afternoon: The CA Legislature just released its own budget proposal, and in it they reject Newsom's proposed cuts to the ATP. The Joint Legislative Budget Plan will now be discussed further, and negotiations will continue until a budget is passed.

In January, Governor Newsom proposed clawing back what remained of the $1 billion "augmentation" to the Active Transportation Program that was added when California was flush with cash a few years ago. Program staff had committed that funding to projects in Cycle 6, but held $200 million in reserve to make sure there was some funding for Cycle 7, which is currently accepting applications.

Newsom saw that $200 million in reserves and decided it would be the only cut he would make to the transportation budget. Then, in May, he proposed taking even more money away from the ATP, for a total of $600 million.

The entire fund estimate for the Active Transportation Program, covering four years of programming and allocations, comes to $568 million from all funding sources, including state and federal monies and the uncommitted portion of the "augmentation."

If his proposal stands, there will be no Cycle 7 funding for the ATP.

Contrast this with the State Highway Account, which is expected to be about $5.4 billion this year.

Pretending that devastating the ATP will help balance the state budget while California continues to spend billions on highway expansions is not only anti-climate, it just doesn't make sense. The ATP is a rounding error compared to the state transportation budget, and it's one of a few parts of that funding that reliably supports climate action.

Negotiations continue in the legislature, with some state lawmakers expressing concern about the ATP funding and asking why the State Highway Fund is not being tapped to backfill it. (Answer: they don't want to cut highway spending). But more people need to speak up.

Advocates are urging people to reach out to their legislative representatives and get them to support funding for the ATP. CalBike provides an easily edited call-to-action form for contacting budget decision makers at the legislature. They are proposing a "people-first mobility budget" that would shift funding from highway expansions to give the ATP a reliable funding source and to build complete streets and other projects that help reduce the need to drive, and would focus the rest of the highway budget on repairing and maintaining state-owed roads.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Eyes on the Street: Pretty Unsafe for a Bikeway, Yeah?

We suspect the signs won’t stay up - they are too clearly NOT official - even though they provide an important warning for bike riders. 

July 30, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines

Some rollbacks in Oakland and Carlsbad. New traffic calming in SF. And much more...

July 30, 2025

Shifting Gears to Urban Bike Delivery

Bikes can revolutionize delivery in urban areas. A new report outlines how policymakers can spur them in their communities.

July 29, 2025

Bike East Bay Lists Incremental Victories

From Antioch to Oakland, advocates are making slow but steady headway that's sometimes eclipsed by the showier projects.

July 29, 2025

Rosemead Now Offers Zero Emission Microtransit

The service operates within city limits, but offers further rides for older and disabled riders.

July 29, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines

New protected bike lanes in Long Beach and Oakland....less protected bike lanes in Vista.

July 29, 2025
See all posts