Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Note: GJEL Accident Attorneys regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog California. Unless noted in the story, GJEL Accident Attorneys is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.

Assembly Bill 1713, which would have allowed bike riders to treat stop signs as yield signs, easily passed the Assembly and could have passed the Senate, but it never got the chance. Governor Newsom had made it clear that he was not willing to sign it, so the bill's author, Assemblymember Tasha Boerner Horvath, pulled it at the last minute.

Last year, Newsom vetoed a similar bill from the same author. This version addressed the concerns he mentioned at the time by having it apply only to bike riders over the age of eighteen, but it wasn't enough.

The bill has strong support, although two groups who opposed it openly: The California Association of Highway Patrolmen (not the CHP, which has no official position on it), and the California Coalition for Children’s Safety and Health, which has argued that the change would lead to dangerous riding habits and more crashes, despite evidence to the contrary.

It's a blow for safety advocates, who have noted that other states that have passed similar laws have seen a decrease in crashes at intersections. Not requiring bike riders to come to a full stop any time they are faced with a stop sign, even where there is no other traffic, acknowledges that bikes are not cars, and stop signs affect bike riders differently than car drivers.

The bill never proposed changing the law to allow bike riders to just fly through intersections; it would only allow bikes to slow and proceed when safe, and would reduce opportunities for police to pull over riders for specious reasons or purely for not following the letter of the law no matter what the circumstances.

Boerner Horvath told bill advocates that she will try again, and plans to work with the administration and state agencies, including Caltrans, CalSTA, and the CHP, to find common ground.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Port Lobbyists Trying to Kill Bike and Pedestrian Safety in Oakland

Trucking/port lobbyists want to destroy a long-established plan to build protected bike lanes connecting Jack London Square, West Oakland, and downtown

July 12, 2024

Friday Video: Take a Spin on Boston’s Electric Cargo Bike Share

Can't afford a $7,000 Urban Arrow cargo e-bike ? In Boston, you can now rent one for just a few bucks.

July 12, 2024

Friday’s Headlines

5 recommendations for high-speed rail; Caltrans, stop building new freeway lanes already; "Data bikes" can collect information about bike path conditions; More

July 12, 2024

Next Week: Active Transportation Program Workshop

The good news is that there will be a Cycle 7. But it will be small, and there will be hard choices about what gets funded.

July 11, 2024

Metro and Caltrans Still Planning 605 Expansion, Plus Four Connecting Freeways

Metro and Caltrans are planning to spend billions of dollars widening the 605, 5, 10, 60 and 105 Freeways. Really.

July 11, 2024
See all posts