Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Freeways

Metro Committee Expected to Vote to Not Build Lower 710 Freeway Widening Project

LongBeachize_Ad_Concepts
This article supported by Los Angeles Bicycle Attorney as part of a general sponsorship package. All opinions in the article are that of the author, and do not necessarily reflect those of LABA. Click on the ad for more information.
false

Tomorrow, the Metro board Planning and Programming Committee is expected to formally cancel the lower 710 Freeway widening project that Caltrans and Metro had sought to build for decades. The committee is expected to approve the "No Build" alternative for the 710 project, reversing a 2018 Metro board approval of a $6+ billion dollar two-lane widening - with hundreds of home/business demolitions. Metro and Caltrans are now instead touting their pursuit of a equity- and environment-focused "multimodal investment strategy" for the 710 corridor.

Metro and Caltrans are not doing this out of the kindness of its heart. The community caught them trying to get around environmental laws, and then, when federal and state agencies essentially declared the project illegal and harmful, local freeway builders reluctantly acknowledged the necessity of restarting their planning process.

Southeast L.A. County communities, organized as the Coalition for Environmental Health and Justice (CEHAJ), had long insisted on no displacement. For decades CEHAJ opposed Caltrans and Metro's widening plans, including the version approved in 2018. In late 2020, the federal Environmental Protection Agency ruled that the project didn't meet Clean Air Act laws. For months, Metro did not share the EPA's ruling publicly, but Streetsblog obtained and published it May 2021. Caltrans then paused the project. Then the Metro board suspended it, forming another 710 Freeway task force charged with reworking plans for the 710.

In a February letter to Metro CEO Stephanie Wiggins, Caltrans District 7 Director Tony Tavares formally requested that the Metro board approve the 710 "No Build" alternative:

Caltrans wishes to move forward with selecting the ‘No Build’ alternative as the LPA [Locally Preferred Alternative]. We believe that this determination is responsive to current concerns related to property, equity, and environmental/air quality impacts. Further, this determination allows the District to focus on clean transportation alternatives, the reduction of Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT), and brings proper closure to the I-710 environmental process. As a project partner for many years, as well as the NEPA and CEQA [National Environmental Policy Act and California Environmental Quality Act] lead agency, Caltrans would appreciate Metro directing the consulting team to work with our staff to complete the Final EIR/EIS [Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement] and Project Report.

At tomorrow's 10:30 a.m. meeting, the board committee is expected to approve an item selecting "Alternative 1, the 'No Build' alternative, as the new Locally Preferred Alternative for the I-710 South Corridor Project Final Environmental Document." If approved by the committee, then the item would go to the full board next week for final approval.

Also on tomorrow's agenda is a motion put forth by Metro Boardmembers Janice Hahn, Hilda Solis, Holly Mitchell, and Fernando Dutra that would further clarify reporting and interagency/community collaboration in coming up with a revised 710 Freeway corridor project, as well as explicitly stating, as several Metro staff have been stating at 710 meetings for the past year, that Metro adopt "Board policy that capacity expansion freeway widening will no longer be in the project."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Covina to Begin Construction on Recreation Village

The new facility will be next to the Metrolink station and include a variety of opportunities for fitness and amusement

July 26, 2024

Talking Headways Podcast: Have Cities Run Out of Land?

Chris Redfearn of USC and Anthony Orlando of Cal Poly Pomona on why "pro-business" Texas housing markets are catching up to "pro-regulation" California and what it might mean for future city growth.

July 26, 2024

Friday’s Headlines

Oakland identifies sites for speed camera pilot; E-bike tariffs conflict with US climate policy; Pollution spikes around warehouses, shipping hubs; More

July 26, 2024

What the Heck is Going on with the State E-bike Incentive Program?

The program's launch has been delayed for two years, and currently "there is no specific timeline" for it. Plus the administrator, Pedal Ahead, is getting dragged, but details are vague

July 26, 2024

The Paris Plan for Olympic Traffic? Build More Bike Lanes

A push to make Paris fully bikable for the Olympics is already paying dividends long before the opening ceremonies.

July 25, 2024
See all posts