Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Streetsblog California

The Smog President Takes California to Court

I'm not even sure which Trump-made disaster he's trying to distract people from with this latest stunt.

It sometimes feels like the easiest way to understand federal environmental policy these days is to start with a joke: if someone’s goal were to make the air dirtier and hasten global warming, they might start by doubling down on coal power and revoking funding for the nation’s largest rail project. And when a spike in gas prices is helping people consider alternatives to fossil-fuel powered cars, go after the places trying hardest to promote cleaner technologies

Unfortunately, for anyone who doesn’t like smog and loves their (actual, future, or hypothetical) grandchildren, that is exactly what the Trump Administration is doing.

Image: Roth Cartoons

Trump Administration Sues California Over Vehicle Emissions Rules

Yesterday, the Trump administration filed a new lawsuit against California, arguing the state lacks the legal authority to enforce its nation-leading vehicle emissions standards and zero-emission vehicle requirements.

The suit, brought by the U.S. Departments of Justice and Transportation, targets regulations adopted by the California Air Resources Board that limit greenhouse-gas emissions from cars and require automakers to sell increasing numbers of zero-emission vehicles. Those rules are part of California’s “Advanced Clean Cars II” program, which aims to phase out the sale of new gasoline-powered vehicles by 2035.

Federal officials argue that California’s policies amount to an illegal attempt to regulate fuel economy, an area they say is reserved for the federal government under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. The administration contends that allowing individual states to impose stricter rules effectively forces automakers to follow California’s standards nationwide.

“Federal law prohibits individual states from adopting regulations related to fuel economy,” federal officials said in announcing the lawsuit, framing California’s policies as a backdoor mandate for electric vehicles.

California officials strongly dispute that characterization. The state has long had unique authority under the federal Clean Air Act to set stricter emissions standards than the federal government if it receives a waiver from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. That authority dates back decades because of the extraordinary amount of smog in Southern California.

In the 1970s, the Los Angeles region experienced more than 200 smog days per year, but decades of cleaner vehicle standards and pollution controls have reduced that to roughly 80–100 days in recent years, though the area still has some of the worst air quality in the United States.

The state argues that its rules regulate pollution rather than fuel economy and that they are necessary to meet climate goals and improve air quality in regions such as the Los Angeles basin and the San Joaquin Valley.

Governor Gavin Newsom’s office dismissed the lawsuit as meritless and vowed to defend the standards in court. State leaders say the policies are also intended to keep California competitive in the rapidly growing clean-vehicle industry.

Senator Adam Schiff makes his case before the Senate narrowly voted to undermine California's efforts to keep our air clean.

The Lawsuit Is Part of a Long Tradition of Trump Favoring Smog Over Californians

Last year, the Trump administration and congressional allies succeeded in overturning key California clean-vehicle policies the state was authorized to implement under the Clean Air Act. The move targeted multiple state programs, including the Advanced Clean Cars II rule requiring increasing sales of zero-emission vehicles and other regulations aimed at reducing pollution from trucks and buses. 

Those congressional resolutions attempted to revoke the federal waivers that historically allowed California to set stronger standards than the federal government. California and a coalition of states who have opted to follow California’s standards instead of federal ones quickly filed suit, arguing that Congress overstepped its authority.

With Congress attempting to nullify California’s authority and the Justice Department now seeking to strike down the rules in court, the conflict is poised to continue for years—likely with the courts deciding whether the state that pioneered modern vehicle pollution rules can continue to lead on clean air.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Streets for All: SoCal Could Fund All of Southland’s High-Speed Rail with EIFD

Streets for All report shows that all of SoCal High-Speed Rail could be funded with EIFD's, with money leftover to support local transit.

March 25, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

More news on legislation and transit funding as Mayor Bass skips a Streets for All forum. Also: No Kings.

March 25, 2026

Eyes on the Street: Progress on Folsom Streetscape Project

One of SoMa's major thoroughfares is getting long-overdue repairs that will include bike and ped safety improvements.

March 24, 2026

D.C. Advocates Sue To Save Key Bike Lane From Trump Teardown

We previously reported that the Trump administration might soon move to dismantle key cycle tracks in the nation's capital. Unfortunately, we were right.

March 24, 2026

Monrovia Seeks Input on Draft Bike Master Plan

The deadline for public comment is this Friday, March 27 2026.

March 24, 2026

Santa Rosa Quietly Approves Additional Mall Parking in Pedestrian and Art Plaza; Activists Appeal

“Why do they need more parking? It feels like they’re trying to sneak something by the public.’’

March 24, 2026
See all posts