Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Safety

Open Letter to S.F. Mayor Breed: Who’s Going to Be Fired?

"City vehicles should never block the pedestrian right-of-way or bicycle lanes," Mayor Breed's directive, Aug. 29, 2019.

To the Honorable Mayor London Breed:

Thank you for your ongoing commitment to Vision Zero, the city's promise to end fatalities and serious injuries on our city streets. You've given great speeches and continually affirmed your dedication to this goal.

We believe you are sincere.

But, as you know, we've had 22 fatalities already this year. Our city's policies simply aren't working. Officials and advocates seem to rarely talk about the deadline to achieve zero traffic deaths by 2024 anymore, since it's obvious we're not going to make it without serious and immediate change.

But we can do it, and here is a test for you.

You recently gave an order on safety. Here it is again, from your office's official press release:

"Mayor Breed has directed City departments to model safe habits on our street and has established guidelines that, unless responding to an emergency, City vehicles should never block the pedestrian right-of-way or bicycle lanes." [emphasis added]

That's not ambiguous. It also reaffirms existing law: it's illegal (with a few exceptions) and dangerous to block a bike lane.

And then this happened Wednesday evening:

Thank you, Kyle Grochmal, for your tireless activism. But no thank you, SFMTA, for this response:

Talk about missing the point.

Whoever signed off on using bike lanes as a staging area for buses has to go. It wasn't the agency that let this happen. It wasn't a computer program. It was a city employee. And when a public employee ignores your directive and sh*ts on Vision Zero, they need to go.

Mayor Breed, you sacked SFMTA Director Ed Reiskin for failing to get the agency to shape up. Reiskin wasn't the only culprit. You can't fire all of them, but you also don't need to. You just have to send a clear message that if a city employee disobeys your directives and disregards the safety of the public, as they often do, then proceedings will begin the next day to terminate that employee.

If you don't act, you send a message that safety, as well as complying with your directives, are optional.

Sincerely,

Streetsblog San Francisco

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

CA High-Speed Rail Approves Large Cost Overrun, Legislation Moves to Empower Inspector General, Unhinged Critics Criticize

The California Post tabloid newspaper arrives, and so does sensationalized criticism of California High-Speed Rail.

February 12, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines

New bike lanes, new Coaster service, and more Vision Zero follies.

February 12, 2026

Talking Headways Podcast: Concrete Doesn’t Spend Money, People Do

Dr. Lawrence Frank shows how the decisions we make about the built environment are a symbol of why the world is so f'd up. A very special edition of Talking Headways.

February 12, 2026

Why Does Trump Wants To Punish Cities For Free Buses?

Hint: it's probably not to make anyone's transportation network better!

February 11, 2026

Eyes on the Street: Shrinking the Gap Between Fruitvale BART and the Cross-Alameda Trail

But there will remain a safety gap on the Fruitvale Avenue bridge.

February 11, 2026

L.A. Seeks Input on Proposed Speed Camera Locations

L.A. is planning 125 speed camera systems citywide - location criteria includes histories of speeding/crashes/racing, areas with concentrated vulnerable populations, etc.

February 11, 2026
See all posts