Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Streetsblog LA

Fun Facts on How Much People Drive in Different Parts of Southern California and L.A.

Here are some interesting tidbits from an L.A. City presentation on the wonky LOS/VMT stuff that SBLA reported on recently. These 2018 figures are not news, but the statistics show that people really do drive less in central, transit-rich areas.

Above is the full slide, taken from a 2018 City Planning Department presentation. Below, Streetsblog will walk readers through individual maps and charts. "VMT" is vehicle miles traveled.

Geographically speaking, L.A. City is a relatively small part of the six-county Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) region.

Map of the six-county SCAG region - includes Ventural, L.A., San Bernardino, Orange and Riverside Counties
Map of Los Angeles City in the context of the six-county SCAG region, which includes Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties
false

On an average weekday, people in Los Angeles City drive 9.3 miles, which is about half (actually 54%) of the Southern California regional average of 17.2 miles. On a weekday, an employee working in L.A. City drives on average 12.9 miles, which is about 60% of the Southern California regional average of 21.3 miles.

On average people in L.A. drive about half as much as people do in the Southern California region
On average people in L.A. drive about half as much as people do in the Southern California region
false

The L.A. City Planning Department (LADCP) breaks the city up into seven areas, called Area Planning Commissions or APCs.

Map of City Planning Areas
Map of City Planning Areas
false

Driving behavior is different in different parts of the city. Below are the city's VMT targets for various parts (APCs - Area Planning Commissions):

How much people drive in different parts of L.A.
How much people drive in different parts of L.A.
false

These numbers are slightly different than the city/regional chart above; they are targets are 15% below the APC average. So below are the calculated actual VMTS for L.A. APCs:

On average people living in the San Fernando Valley drive about 50% more than people living in Central or South Los Angeles. People who work downtown drive about half as much daily as folks who work in the North Valley.

At this grain, it is difficult to make much in the way of definitive statements. APCs are big places; the Hollywood Hills and Skid Row are in the same APC but don't share too much in the way of travel behavior.

For the most part, lower driving rates appear to correspond to transit dependency and poverty - though both the East L.A. and the West L.A. APCs buck that trend somewhat.

It is difficult to tell how much transit/bike/walk usage factors into these measurements. It is clear that core areas see less driving, but some (including some SCAG planners) suggest that this may be mostly a result of driving distances. Some assert that, all over L.A., nearly everybody drives - but in central places, the distances driven are generally shorter. In the middle of L.A., many residents might drive something like 2-4 miles to get to work, school, shopping, and other common destinations. In the more suburban parts of the city, residents might drive more like 4-10 miles to get to those similar destinations. The outlier that bucks this trend is the Central L.A. VMT per employee figure. A rich array of public transit options - buses, Metro rail, Metrolink - serves DTLA workers - and their lower commute drive miles seem to indicate many use transit.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Today’s Headlines

Funding, funding, funding...

December 3, 2025

SFMTA Preps to Remove Kirkham Neck Down

Last Streetsblog reported on it, the neck down at Kirkham and 9th was working fine for safety. But drivers complained, so it's gotta go.

December 2, 2025

SBCTA Could Finally End One of the Country’s Worst Zombie Projects: The ONT Connector

“The ONT Connector is an inappropriate investment. Ridership capacity and public transportation utility do not support spending billions of dollars for it. Scrapping the project is the right decision. Electric rail to ONT is the appropriate decision,” writes Kevin Dedicatoria, The Transit Coalition, Community Consultant. Update, 12/3 - SBCTA Board Votes Unanimously to End Further Study.

December 2, 2025

Your Donation Means More Today Than Ever Before

Do you want more Streetsblog? Of course you do!

December 2, 2025

Baldwin Park Update: Progress on Path and Park Projects

The new connection from Walnut Creek Nature Park to the greenway walk/bike path is just about finished, and the huge expansion on Barnes Park is trooping along.

December 2, 2025
See all posts