Assembly Passes Bills to Extend Greenhouse Gas Targets to 2030

Assemblymember Eduardo Garcia (D-Coachella Valley), flanked by Governor Jerry Brown, addresses the press after two major climate change policy bills passed.
Assemblymember Eduardo Garcia (D-Coachella Valley), flanked by Governor Jerry Brown, addresses the press after two major climate change policy bills passed.

Today, the California Assembly passed A.B. 197, the companion bill to the Senate’s greenhouse gas reduction target bill, S.B. 32, which it passed yesterday. A.B. 197 will now go to Governor Jerry Brown to sign into law, which he has said he is eager to do. S.B. 32, which extends greenhouse gas reduction targets out until 2030, passed the Senate later in the afternoon and is also headed to the governor’s desk.

Proponents hail the passage of the bill as a historic moment, continuing and expanding California’s precedent-setting climate change efforts. Senator Fran Pavley’s S.B. 32 extends her original 2006 bill, A.B. 32, which called for California to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. The new bill sets new targets of 40 percent below those 1990 levels by 2030.

S.B. 32 leaves it up to the California Air Resources Board to adopt rules and regulations “in an open public process” to “achieve the maximum, technologically feasible, and cost-effective greenhouse gas emissions reductions.”

The passage of S.B. 32, which did not look like a sure thing a year ago, was surely helped by being connected to its companion bill, A.B. 197 from Assemblymember Eduardo Garcia (D-Coachella). That bill gives the legislature oversight stronger oversight over the Air Resources Board, something that critics of A.B. 32 and its resulting rules about cap and trade have complained is needed.

Oversight is provided through the addition of two members of the legislature to the Board as well as by creating a Joint Legislative Committee on Climate Change Policies, to include at least three Senators and three Assemblymembers. The bill also requires the ARB to make its emissions data available to the public, and to report on each method and alternative methods it considers for reducing greenhouse gases.

Garcia, presenting his bill to the Assembly today, addressed charges that the two bills do not “go far enough.” But “doing nothing keeps us in the same position, with our hands tied behind our back, continuing to complain about ARB being out of control and losing our ability as a legislature to do anything about climate change,” he said. “I feel confident about the oversight this will bring.”

“In passing SB 32, we drew up a road map. AB 197 is the vehicle that gets us there,” wrote Speaker of the Assembly Anthony Rendon in an official statement.

“Assembly Bill 197 provides the mechanisms to make sure the goals we set in SB 32 are reached. Greater legislative oversight, as well as agency accountability and data transparency from the Air Resources Board will only make our climate change efforts benefit all Californians.”

Despite charges from some legislators in hearings that their communities are suffering from job loss as a result of California’s stringent emissions controls, business leaders also applauded the legislation. Nicole Lederer, chair of national nonpartisan business group Environmental Entrepreneurs, wrote: “California’s legislators just doubled down on one of the strongest, most innovative climate policies in the world. Their vote is welcome news to a broad and inclusive coalition of business leaders who are demanding ever-stronger climate action.”

At a press conference following the vote, Senate President Pro Tem Kevin De León (D-Los Angeles) dismissed charges that economic hardship resulted from climate policies. “That’s a false narrative, a myth that’s been perpetuated for far too long,” he said. “We have no empirical data to suggest that our climate change policies have led to job loss. We do have the empirical evidence that shows we have created 500,000 brand new jobs in green industries.” Those are brand new, never-before-seen jobs, he said. And communities that have lost jobs due to general market changes or other causes would be in much worse shape if these new jobs hadn’t been created as part of California’s climate change policies.

“This is not just reducing carbon in the abstract,” said De León. “It’s also about economic growth. This is a new direction for our economy. We’ve shown that we can grow and prosper without poisoning our communities or our children. The ‘green economy’ has grown from boutique to a real pillar of our economy, and it is here to stay.”

At the press conference, Governor Jerry Brown said, “This is a very important milestone. It gives legislative force to our clean air goals for 2030, and it’s a real commitment backed up by real power.”

About opposition to the bill, Brown said, “Bring it on.”

“The effort to decarbonize our economy is extremely difficult. It’s a a tall hill that we’re climbing, and there is opposition,” he said. Of course the oil companies object, he observed, because they are selling a product that will “ultimately have to be reduced substantially for us to live a clean healthy life.”

“It’s never easy; it’s never perfect,” he added, “but we can keep correcting it with oversight, and with wisdom. We haven’t finished it all.”

The fate of cap-and-trade is entwined with the fate of these bills, although there is nothing in them that directly addresses the system for creating a market for emissions in the state. A couple of questions are still pending, including how to invest the currently unallocated portion of cap-and-trade revenue. The legislature has one week to reach agreement before the session ends next Wednesday.

Senator De León brought up the question at the press conference, saying that an agreement needs to be made soon so that we can reap the most greenhouse gas reduction benefits in the shortest time possible. One journalist asked Brown if he agreed with De León. “Are you committed to spending at least a little bit of that money before the end of the session?” she asked.

He smiled. “Exactly,” he said. “I am committed to spending a little of that money.”

5 thoughts on Assembly Passes Bills to Extend Greenhouse Gas Targets to 2030

  1. Late, but good, only if Diablo Canyon remains operating and San Onofre is restarted. Otherwise, states like NY, WI, IL etc. will show California to simply be a gas-industry state — for instance by Pacificorp. Anyone actually concerned with emissions & climate/ocean change, help

  2. Agreed. But let’s not put all of the responsibility on the MPOs — isn’t that what SB 375 did?
    Every governmental entity will need to continue to reduce emissions beyond 2020 now. Had these bills not passed, it would indeed have been bad news for all Californians.

    And because what happens here influences the rest of the nation and even the world, for the rest on the U.S. and even globally.

  3. Heaven help us from the MTC. If you ever wanted an example of a unaccountable, power hungry organization, you’ll find it in the MTC. Did Heminger get a lifetime appointment? Enough of that guy.

  4. This is wonderful news for achieving a California without fossil fuel vehicles. Caltrans has adopted a state plan to achieve 80% reduction in greenhouse gases by 2050, but without SB32, there would be no leverage to push the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (like MTC here in the Bay Area) to actually implement such a plan. Now the work begins to push MTC to work out the details on how to make this happen.

Comments are closed.


Legislative Wrap-up: Environmental Justice, Cap-and-Trade Funding

The lead-up to the end of the California legislative session at midnight last night included a standard amount of grandstanding, tearful farewells, laughter, and exhaustion. Some bills passed and will now await the governor’s good graces, and some died on the legislature floor. Here’s a quick recap of a few bills relevant to sustainable streets. […]

California Legislative Update: Parking Requirements, Cap-and-Trade Funds

This week we’re tracking some of the bills that got left out of last week’s too-long legislative update. These bills relate to transportation funding, climate change, and urban planning. PLANNING Eliminating Parking Minimums: A.B. 744 from Ed Chau (D-Monterey Park) would require a city or county to eliminate minimum parking requirements under certain circumstances, upon […]