Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
bikeatCapitollabel2

In the state legislature this week, the only policy committee that met was the Appropriations Committee, which voted to move forward or let die a long list of bills that have a cost to the state.

Next week, the Budget Conference Committee will begin deliberations on the two budget proposals, S.B. 69 from the Senate and A.B. 103 from the Assembly. The conference committee is a joint Senate and Assembly committee that will make final decisions on what goes into the joint legislative budget proposal. Appointments to the committee were announced this week, and included on the roster is Assemblymember Richard Bloom, who has championed the Active Transportation Program and is author of A.B. 902, which would allow ticketed bicyclists to take a class and lower their fine. In fact, the Assembly budget bill includes an increase of $25 million for that program.

Some of the bills that progressed this week include:

    • A.B. 8 from Assembymember Mike Gatto (D-Glendale) would create a yellow alert system to make it easier for authorities to get help from the public to catch hit-and-run perpetrators.
    • A.B. 40, from Assemblymembers Phil Ting (D-San Francisco) and Marc Levine (D-San Rafael) would prohibit tolls for bikes on state-owned bridges.
    • A.B. 28, from Assemblymember Kansen Chu (D-San Jose) would allow bikes to substitute red lights for the currently required reflectors.
    • A.B. 208, from Assemblymember Frank Bigelow (R-O'Neals) would clarify when bicycles and other slow vehicles must pull over to let other vehicles pass. For some reason, this bill is still alive. (See our previous coverage here.)
    • A.B. 779, from Assemblymember Cristina Garcia (D-Bell Gardens) seeks to delay the implementation of last year's SB 743. That law will remove the use of traffic delay as a measurement of environmental impact under California environmental law. (See our previous coverage here.)
    • A.B. 744, from Ed Chau (D-Monterey Park) would require a city or county to eliminate minimum parking requirements under certain circumstances, upon request by the developer. We covered this bill in more detail here, and see Joe's interview with Donald Shoup about it below.
    • S.B. 192, from Senator Carol Liu (D- La Cañada Flintridge),  started out as a bill requiring bicyclists to wear helmets, and changed to a call for a study of helmet use. This bill seems to be dead for this session, as the Appropriations Committee held on to it.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

CAHSRA Releases Environmental Documents for LA to Anaheim

The 30-mile project section runs from LAUS to ARTIC and would follow an existing passenger and freight rail corridor, passing through parts of Los Angeles County and several Orange and Los Angeles County cities including Vernon, Commerce, Pico Rivera, Norwalk, Buena Park, Fullerton, and Anaheim.

December 5, 2025

Friday’s Headlines

LA is flunking Vision Zero, but what's happening at other parts of the state?

December 5, 2025

Friday Video: Exactly Why the Cybertruck Sucks

Unwind and let yourself hate on Elon Musk a little.

December 4, 2025

California Awards More Than $140 Million of Federal Funds for Local Road-Safety Programs

The projects are aimed at supporting the governor's modest goal of reducing traffic deaths by 30% in a decade.

December 4, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines

I have a great idea on how LA can improve its crumbling infrastructure...

December 4, 2025

Talking Headways Podcast: The (Parking) Reformation

Tony Jordan, president of the Parking Reform Network, discusses getting rid of our cars, parking policy, and Donald Shoup’s legacy.

December 4, 2025
See all posts