Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Speeding

Papan Wants to Draw a Legal Line Between E-Bikes and Electric Motorbikes

Pretty sure the pictured bike should never be referred to as an e-bike.

California legislators are advancing a bill to tighten regulations on electric bicycles in response to a surge in crashes and serious injuries tied to high-powered models. The proposal would limit the motor output of e-bikes sold in the state to a maximum of 750 watts, aligning with existing federal e-bike definitions. It would also clamp down on two-wheeled devices capable of higher speeds that currently blur the line between bicycles and motorized vehicles.

Throughout the state, we’ve seen a hodge-podge of local legislation attempting to regulate and classify e-bikes. The laws sometimes show confusion from those writing them on what is, and isn’t, an e-bike and what is just an electric motorcycle. By tying the definition to wattage, Assemblymember Diane Papan (D-San Mateo) hopes that her legislation, Assembly Bill 1557,  will bring clarity and better rule making and safer streets.

"We think we are really going to enhance safety with it. We don't want to ban it altogether. We just want to make it where the bikes are safer," said Papan in an interview with CBS News. "One little tweak and you're going way over 28 miles an hour.”

Currently, many e-bike motors can be modified to reach 1,200 to 6,000 watts, far exceeding the 750-watt threshold this new legislation would establish. 

Supporters contend that unregulated high-power e-bikes — some approaching or exceeding motorcycle-like performance — pose a rising risk to riders, pedestrians, and other road users when they operate at speeds or power levels not anticipated in current safety rules.

Or as Ted Rogers put it at Biking In L.A., “Maybe then we can finally get everyone to stop calling the damn things (high powered electric motorbikes) e-bikes, and blaming all of us for the actions of a relative few teen knuckleheads.”

Critics of overly broad restrictions caution that e-bikes are a crucial tool for sustainable, equitable transportation — especially for commuters, older riders, and people for whom traditional cycling is physically challenging. They argue that enforcement and education — such as improved helmet use and rider training — should be central to safety strategies, rather than sweeping bans on certain technologies.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Thursday’s Headlines

For some reason people seem upset about gas prices. Oh well.

March 12, 2026

Talking Headways Podcast: Buildings are Here to Help People

Jeremy Wells on his book, Managing the Magic of Old Places: Crafting Public Policies for People-Centered Historic Preservation.

March 12, 2026

Bus Companies Say There’s a Better Way to Take a ‘Great American Road Trip’ This Summer

"Our eventual goal is to make inter-city bus travel every American's first consideration when they think about how to get from one city to the next."

March 11, 2026

Eyes on the Street: New Stations on Metro D Line Extension Section 2

After this May's D Line section 1 opening, there's more D to come! The D is growing longer! Check out photos of new station erection... er... construction today in Beverly Hills and Century City.

March 11, 2026

Op-Ed: Double Parking Likely Contributed to Inner Sunset Tragedy

This is yet another example of why protected bike lanes have to become the default in San Francisco.

March 11, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

Breaking: Building transit is good for transit ridership.

March 11, 2026
See all posts