Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Accessibility

Golden Gate Park Detours the Disabled to Avoid Driver Delay

Note: GJEL Accident Attorneys regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog California. Unless noted in the story, GJEL Accident Attorneys is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.

Advocates for safe streets are calling out the San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department for blocking disabled ramps and an accessway in Golden Gate Park that connects across Music Concourse Drive and Bowl Drive.

As explained in this Twitter post, the culprit is the generator that powers the park's Ferris wheel:

"Looking at Google maps, the way they placed it, it seems like they didn't really think it through," said Pi Ra, Transit Justice Director with Senior and Disability Action, in an interview with Streetsblog. As seen in the satellite view below, the generator, placed between the two zebra-stripe crosswalks, completely blocks a pedestrian route from the J.F.K. Promenade to the Music Concourse and museums:

A bird's eye view of the generator, the white box, blocking the crosswalk and ADA access. Image: Google maps
A bird's eye view of the generator, the white box near the top, just left of center, blocking the crosswalk and ADA access between Music Concourse Drive and Bowl Drive. Image: Google maps
false

Technically, blocking these ramps is legal because, as shown in the lead image and below, there's a detour. "There is an alternate Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible crosswalk about 200 feet south of the closed crosswalk, just at Bowl and Music Concourse drives," wrote Daniel Montes, Rec and Park communications manager, in an email to Streetsblog. "The placement was ultimately chosen as it met specific criteria, including maintaining the minimum 20-foot distance between the generator and any structures, per San Francisco Fire Department requirements. Also, the location reduces impact to the landscaping and its visibility since placing the generator on the lawn would block irrigation."

Montes also provided a photo of the alternate route:

The alternate route around the Ferris wheel. Photo: Park and Rec
The alternate route around the Ferris wheel. Photo: Park and Rec
false

"The site has been reviewed and approved by the Mayor’s Office of Disability," he added.

That may be so, but advocates for the disabled describe this as ticking the ADA checkbox instead of truly considering the needs of the park's most vulnerable visitors.

"I know that when I worked on the 'Getting to the Curb' Report with Walk SF, we recommended that the City should provide ramps along curbside bike lanes (with floating parking) at least every 100 feet. So having to travel 200 feet sounds burdensome to me," wrote Cathy DeLuca, a transportation consultant and advocate for seniors and the disabled.

Note that's 200 feet to the alternate crosswalk and 200 feet to get back.

In Streetsblog's view, there's a reason that ramp and route is there. For an able-bodied person, a potentially 400-foot round-trip diversion may not be a big deal, but for someone who struggles with mobility issues, every extra foot can be a burden. Streetsblog also chaffed at one of the reasons given for placing the generator there: "The location helps reduce people crossing at Bowl Drive, eliminating concerns about congestion and vehicle traffic," wrote Montes.

So, basically, the city approved diverting people in wheel chairs to reduce delays to motorists. Forcing people in wheel chairs to detour for the sake of saving some grass or to avoid a minor inconvenience to drivers seems inappropriate and callous.

If they didn't want to kill some grass, it's perfectly possible to put the generator on Bowl or another of the roadways, detouring motorists instead of people in wheel chairs. Motorists also have the option of using the tunnels under the Music Concourse at Fulton and MLK to access the area.

Instead, the park put all the burden on people who need wheelchair ramps to get around. "Bottom line, it's accessible, but it's not practical," said Pi Ra. "Too much of the city goes by the ADA law, which is a minimum. We can do better than that."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Opinion: Yes, the GDP Rises When We Drive More. But That Isn’t A Good Thing.

Expensive hospital stays after car crashes, swelling healthcare spending on sedentary lifestyle diseases, and constant fuel consumption when residents have no choice but driving are all "good" for the national bottom line. But are they good for us?

November 12, 2024

What the U.S. Can Learn From the ‘Bike Mayor’ of Africa, Manuel de Araújo

What can the U.S. learn from developing countries where car dependency hasn't yet taken root — and from the visionary mayors who are fighting to make sure it never does, even in uncertain times?

November 12, 2024

Tuesday’s Headlines

SF to begin enforcing intersection daylighting rules; CARB approves new clean fuels standards; Marin Co Supes want to remove bridge bike lane; More

November 12, 2024

Metro Ridership Snapshot Suggests Added Service, Bus Lanes, and Walk/Bike Projects Increase Riders

Overall Metro ridership grew 7.5 percent year-over-year, but some rail and bus lines grew 10-20+ percent. SBLA explores factors that influenced outsized system-leading ridership increases.

November 8, 2024

Safe-Streets Politicians Gain in the Bay Area

Against the national news of suck, here's a bit more good news around the Bay Area

November 8, 2024
See all posts