Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Advocacy

Freedom to Walk Bill – Decriminalizing Jaywalking – Is on the Governor’s Desk

Sometimes people have few choices about safely crossing streets

Note: GJEL Accident Attorneys regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog California. Unless noted in the story, GJEL Accident Attorneys is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.

This time around, California might begin to reform its ineffective and unfair jaywalking laws, as Assemblymember Phil Ting's A.B. 2147 has passed the legislature and is on its way to Governor Newsom.

Streetsblog has written a lot of posts about why jaywalking laws are a problem. CalBike has a good list of reasons to get rid of them on its website, including that jaywalking laws were created in the first place to get people out of the way of cars, not to keep them safe. They force people to walk long distances to cross streets legally. They reinforce an inequitable and unsafe hierarchy of street users which puts the most vulnerable users at the bottom and keeps them "safe" by erasing them. They encourage enforcement practices that put a heavy and unfair burden on low-income residents. They are disproportionately applied to Black people.

This segment from the show Adam Ruins Everything does a great job explaining the history of jaywalking.

Assemblymember Ting got a similar bill onto the governor's desk last year. Newsom vetoed it, saying he feared that it would "unintentionally reduce pedestrian safety and potentially increase fatalities or serious injuries."

A.B. 2147 moved easily through the legislature, but so did its predecessor. So what's different this time around that the same Governor might sign it? Assemblymember Ting told Bike Summit attendees this spring that Newsom reached out to him after last year's veto to find a solution, so he hoped for a better outcome. Ting, Newsom, and the CHP, which was holding its thumb on the scale, worked together to find common ground.

Instead of repealing the jaywalking law, A.B. 2147 defines specifically when police are allowed to stop pedestrians for unsafe street behavior. That is, crossing a street unsafely won't just suddenly become legal. The bill says that it would "prohibit a peace officer from stopping a pedestrian for specified traffic infractions unless a reasonably careful person would realize there is an immediate danger of collision with a moving vehicle or other device moving exclusively by human power."

Other states and cities have also begun to reform jaywalking laws.

CalBike provides an easy link to help you urge the Governor to sign A.B. 2147

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Op/Ed: The Cameras We Fear and the Speed We Ignore

We can hold two ideas at once. Surveillance systems that accumulate unchecked power deserve opposition. Tools that are narrow, transparent, and built with statutory guardrails deserve evaluation on their merits.

February 27, 2026

The Week in Short Video

Fresno ballot measures, wild armadillos, gas tax holidays, and four miles of mid-city Los Angeles subway opening in May

February 27, 2026

Friday’s Headlines

We wanted e-bike incentives. They offered EV rebates. But maybe we'll get nothing.

February 27, 2026

Americans Demand Congress Fund Active Transportation In Next Infrastructure Bill — And Not Just The Bike/Walk Advocates

A "back to basics" surface transportation bill — as Republicans are seeking — would be devastating for road safety and small businesses.

February 26, 2026

“Stop Super Speeders Act” Takes Aim at California’s Most Dangerous Drivers

Bill would stop super speeders after they're caught and hopefully before they kill.

February 26, 2026

SGV Bus Rapid Transit Gets Another $3.9M for Study and Design

Early improvements combine for about 14 miles of continuous bus lanes, expected to be installed in advance of the 2028 Olympic games.

February 26, 2026
See all posts