Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Advocacy

Freedom to Walk Bill – Decriminalizing Jaywalking – Is on the Governor’s Desk

Sometimes people have few choices about safely crossing streets

Note: GJEL Accident Attorneys regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog California. Unless noted in the story, GJEL Accident Attorneys is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.

This time around, California might begin to reform its ineffective and unfair jaywalking laws, as Assemblymember Phil Ting's A.B. 2147 has passed the legislature and is on its way to Governor Newsom.

Streetsblog has written a lot of posts about why jaywalking laws are a problem. CalBike has a good list of reasons to get rid of them on its website, including that jaywalking laws were created in the first place to get people out of the way of cars, not to keep them safe. They force people to walk long distances to cross streets legally. They reinforce an inequitable and unsafe hierarchy of street users which puts the most vulnerable users at the bottom and keeps them "safe" by erasing them. They encourage enforcement practices that put a heavy and unfair burden on low-income residents. They are disproportionately applied to Black people.

This segment from the show Adam Ruins Everything does a great job explaining the history of jaywalking.

Assemblymember Ting got a similar bill onto the governor's desk last year. Newsom vetoed it, saying he feared that it would "unintentionally reduce pedestrian safety and potentially increase fatalities or serious injuries."

A.B. 2147 moved easily through the legislature, but so did its predecessor. So what's different this time around that the same Governor might sign it? Assemblymember Ting told Bike Summit attendees this spring that Newsom reached out to him after last year's veto to find a solution, so he hoped for a better outcome. Ting, Newsom, and the CHP, which was holding its thumb on the scale, worked together to find common ground.

Instead of repealing the jaywalking law, A.B. 2147 defines specifically when police are allowed to stop pedestrians for unsafe street behavior. That is, crossing a street unsafely won't just suddenly become legal. The bill says that it would "prohibit a peace officer from stopping a pedestrian for specified traffic infractions unless a reasonably careful person would realize there is an immediate danger of collision with a moving vehicle or other device moving exclusively by human power."

Other states and cities have also begun to reform jaywalking laws.

CalBike provides an easy link to help you urge the Governor to sign A.B. 2147

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Uber’s Controversial Ballot Measure Seeks Caps on Lawyers Fees in Traffic Crashes

Uber is behind an effort to gather signatures for a measure for the November 2026 ballot.

January 6, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines

It's a big list today. Probably need to click on the link and read through.

January 6, 2026

Five ‘Supercool’ Transportation Founders to Watch in 2026

These start-up leaders are throwing their weight behind the fight to decarbonize our city transportation networks — and this podcast host is picking their brains.

January 5, 2026

UCLA Study Finds Metro Transit Ambassador Program Is Benefitting Metro Riders

"Overall, ambassadors contribute to improved passenger experiences and play a needed role not well-served by other existing staff or system design features."

January 5, 2026

Commentary: Let’s Do Better in 2026

During the holidays, I got a rude reminder of why advocacy tactics have to change. In 2026, let's demand better before we give support to questionable leaders.

January 5, 2026

CA Closes Door on Getting Feds to Live Up to High-Speed Rail Promises. Opens Arms to Private Investors.

Private investments could put lie to Trump's claim that CA High-Speed Rail is a fraud and a failure.

January 5, 2026
See all posts