More important, though, experts say the President's proposal would exacerbate ongoing challenges for the entire U.S. economy, quickly eclipsing any modest short-term benefits for people who drive gas-powered cars — all while further reinforcing a car-dependent transportation system the country couldn't sustain before prices climbed above $5 a gallon.
Truth is we gave up on the federal gas tax like three decades ago. It’s a pretend thing now.
— Angie Schmitt🚶♀️ (@schmangee) June 22, 2022
In addition to astronomical expenses associated with subsidizing the use of vehicles that are among the largest contributors climate change, a recent Urban Institute report warned that gas tax suspensions often lead to increased inflation as demand rises in response to the cuts, while simultaneously draining public coffers that could be used to build badly-needed infrastructure.
Some particularly pivotal members of Congress seem to agree.
“Although well-intentioned, this policy would at best achieve only miniscule relief while blowing a $10-billion hole in the Highway Trust Fund that would need to be filled if we want to continue to fix crumbling bridges, address the spike in traffic deaths, and build a modern infrastructure system," Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), chair of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, said in a statement. "Furthermore, encouraging state governments to suspend their gas taxes undermines the impact of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law by reducing funds available to states to spend on infrastructure improvements. We should instead deliver relief directly to consumers by ending Big Oil’s price gouging and profiteering.”
stop trying to make sense of why they are suspending the gas tax in terms of economics or sustainability, it is not policy it's politics
— NEOM DEI Engagement Coordinator (@nickhasthoughts) June 22, 2022
DeFazio is pushing a bill that would certainly help cut costs for drivers more than a tax holiday, but advocates say it wouldn't address the more fundamental reason why Americans spend so much at the pump: because they functionally have no other choice but to drive. And that car dependent status quo harms more than just drivers.
“Over the last century, America has built a transportation system that makes it easy to drive and hard to do almost anything else," said Lisa Frank, executive director of Environment America's Washington legislative office. "As an unintended consequence, car-centric policies have also left us with choking traffic, polluted air and a dangerously warming planet. And they leave us vulnerable to oil price shocks caused by events over which we have no control, such as armed conflict half a world away.
"There is a way out of this mess, but it isn’t through short-term solutions like gas tax holidays," Frank added.
Reminder that suspending the gas tax still requires taxpayers to pay for roads and highways.
— David Zipper (@DavidZipper) June 22, 2022
But now those on the left pay more of that cost, and those on the right pay less. pic.twitter.com/xiyTUTantA
Frank emphasizes that to decrease transportation burdens for all Americans, Congress should focus on long-term solutions, like encouraging states to use their Bipartisan Infrastructure law dollars to provide "more and better alternatives to driving, such as rail, regional transit, walking and biking."
In the meantime, advocates say there's still a lot policymakers can do to give Americans short-term relief, without reinforcing the car dependent status quo.
"Instead of subsidizing gasoline sales, why don’t we provide a ‘holiday’ on transit fares?" asked Matt Casale, environment campaigns director for the U.S. Public Interest Research Group. "Or we could provide emergency incentives for carpooling, or boost funding for workplace programs that help workers find cleaner commuting options. We could provide subsidies to offset the cost of e-bikes and conventional bikes. Or even pay people to ditch their cars altogether. That would cut back on demand for oil and ease price pressures for everyone.”
Once again, I want to know what the medium & long term plans are to lessen the dependence on cars in this country? Who is casting that vision? Do our elected leaders have no imagination or backbone to stand up to car culture? Sadly, I know the answer. https://t.co/6oUiRo88fc
— Jerome Alexander Horne (@jahorne) June 22, 2022
Casale's suggestions, of course, aren't an exhaustive list. A handful of communities around the world are already trying even more novel strategies to ease the sting of the latest oil shock, like offering ultra cheap monthly fares for long-distance train travel; others need only turn back a few pages in the quarantine-era transportation playbook to learn how to rapidly build pop-up bike lanes, sidewalks, and other open spaces where people can safely travel without an automobile.
Whatever strategies U.S. communities ultimately adopt, advocates say it's critical that they act now, and act big.
"The current gas price spike is just the latest reminder that our dependence on oil leaves us all over a barrel," Casale added. "To really help consumers, we need more than a gas tax holiday — we need real transportation solutions that do not further deepen our dependence on cars and oil over the long haul."sizes="(min-width: 80em) 400px,(min-width: 64em) and (max-width: 80em) 400px,(min-width: 48em) and (max-width: 64em) 400px,(min-width: 32em) and (max-width: 64em) 400px,(min-width: 32em) and (max-width: 48em) 400px,(max-width: 32em) 400px,(max-width: 48em) 400px,400px" srcset="https://lede-admin.usa.streetsblog.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/46/2020/08/Angie-Schmitt-headshot.jpg?w=400&h=400 400w" alt="Angie Schmitt" width="197" height="197" /> Angie Schmitt
The Black Lives Matter protests and the pandemic have dramatically shifted the terrain around policing. As a result, the last two years have brought about the first serious rethinking of jaywalking laws in a century, challenging a practically universal American rule that dates back to some of the earliest auto industry lobbying campaigns.
The state of Virginia kicked things off by decriminalizing jaywalking in March 2021, followed by Kansas City, Mo. one month later. The state of Nevada did the same in June. About 12 million Americans now live in places where jaywalking has been decriminalized in some form.
The movement suffered a serious blow last October, however, when California Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed legislation passed by the state’s legislature that would have decriminalized jaywalking for the state’s 39 million residents. Newsom used alleged safety concerns as the basis for his veto.
But a modified bill is moving its way through the California legislature right now. Safety groups like California Walks and Los Angeles Walks as well as national groups like America Walks were key advocates for the reform in California, recognizing that street safety concerns for Black and Latino pedestrians also include concerns about police profiling and brutality, which are frequently associated with jaywalking enforcement.
In addition, the movement to reframe the way we regulate walking has opened the door for a more fundamental rethinking of the way we frame pedestrian safety. These efforts represented a shift from a “pedestrian responsibilities” framework to a “pedestrian rights” framework.
One unintended consequence of our “jaywalking” laws is how they create the implicit assumption that if a pedestrian is struck by a car, they somehow "deserved" it — even when sidewalk and crosswalk infrastructure are woefully incomplete or dangerously lacking.
Now it has been more than a year since the first of these reforms went into place, and we can get an early sense of how it is working out.
This data is noisy — especially in smaller communities like cities, which may have relatively few p edestrian deaths in an average year. And it must be noted that these reforms happened in the context of a wider transportation system that's experiencing rising pedestrian deaths nationally.
However, one thing the early data seems to show is that jaywalking laws themselves are not producing the kind of safety disaster some opponents predicted. In fact, according to the data we could find in each jurisdiction, there didn’t appear to be any noticeable impact at all.
Virginia — March
Here’s a look at what’s been happening with pedestrian deaths and serious injuries in Virginia, which was the first to decriminalize jaywalking in March 2020. Jaywalking was eliminated as a primary offense through an action of the Legislature, as part of a package of criminal justice reforms targeting common sources of “pretextual” police stops like tinted windows and the smell of marijuana.
This specific measure flew under the radar and was barely reported, says Wyatt Gordon, a reporter at the Virginia Mercury who covered the development. But the measure was included in the legislation at the request of biking and walking advocacy groups as well as criminal justice reformers who pointed out that the law was frequently used to target homeless people.
Gordon says he’s not surprised it doesn’t seem to have had much effect on safety numbers and he thinks it's probable that the majority of Virginians aren’t aware of the change.
"At the end of the day jaywalking is more of a criminal justice issue than a pedestrian safety issue,” said Gordon, adding he doesn’t think fines are an effective deterrent. “The consequence of getting killed is far worse than the consequence of a misdemeanor ticket.”
As you can see in the above graph, which shows data from Virginia’s DMV, the commonwealth had a pretty typical year in 2021 in terms of pedestrian deaths and injuries. The trendline since 2016 actually shows a gradual decrease in fatalities, which is at odds with national trends, where these kinds of deaths have been accelerating rapidly. It should be noted as well that 2021 was an especially bad year, nationally.
Kansas City (MO) — May
Kansas City went farther than other jurisdictions and completely eliminated jaywalking from its criminal code in May 2021. The statute was removed as part of a wider initiative initiated by Mayor Quinton Lucas as part of a wider reform aimed at addressing racially biased pretextual police stops.
Michael Kelley is policy director at Bike Walk Kansas City, which pushed for the inclusion of bike and pedestrian infractions on the list of ordinances that were struck from the city’s books.
“Jaywalking is something that is specifically about punishing people who are navigating the environment that wasn’t made for them,” said Kelley.
The latest data about pedestrian deaths is not available yet from Kansas City, but we’ll be keeping a close eye on it.
Nevada — June
Last June, the Fines and Fees Justice Center successfully lobbied for jaywalking reform in Nevada, along with a raft of other changes aimed at eliminating the kinds of infractions that likely lent themselves to racial profiling.
Leisa Moseley, Nevada State Director for the group, says a lot of law enforcement officials are upset about the change.
“They’re saying this legislation prevents them from stopping people from jaywalking,” she said. “It does not. What it prevents them from doing is stopping people and arresting people for jaywalking.”
Under Nevada’s new law, jaywalking was changed from a misdemeanor to a civil fine ($100). As a result, Moseley said, police seem to have lost interest in enforcing the rule, which was frequently used as a pretext to stop-and-frisk people in low-income or Black or Latino neighborhoods.
But some law enforcement groups' contention that pedestrian safety has worsened as a result doesn’t seem to be borne out by a close look at the data. There were 85 pedestrian deaths in 2021, up from 82 the year prior. But that seems to be noise, not any effect of the law changing. Overall traffic deaths were up 18 percent statewide that year while pedestrian deaths rose 3.6 percent.
The bigger safety problem is Nevada’s unsafe streets, Moseley said.
“They’re not designed for pedestrian safety, they're designed for cars,” she said. “Even our laws are designed for cars.”
California — Soon?
America Walks was immensely disappointed when Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill that would have decriminalized walking in California last fall. However, the good news is, a modified version of that bill is currently making its way through the legislature in the Golden State.
A bill sponsored by Assembly Member Phil Ting (D-San Francisco) — AB2147, the Freedom to Walk Act — was passed in the Assembly. It has been assigned to the Public Safety Committee in the Senate.
“Jaywalking laws go largely unenforced in affluent communities throughout the state, where people walk freely without consequence,” said Rio Scharf, an attorney with Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area, a sponsor of the bill. “But in the communities we serve, these citations are a cause of discriminatory police stops and significant court debt.”
If California moves forward with its change, about 51.4 million Americans will live in a jurisdiction that has decriminalized walking. That’s a big change over a short time and one that, at this point, doesn’t seem to be having much effect on safety, while helping protect the civil rights of people of color and preserving police resources for real safety issues.
Conclusion
It is our goal to decriminalize jaywalking in all US states and territories. If you are working on such an effort, or know of such an effort, let us know.
Editor's note: A version of this article originally appeared on the America Walks blog and is republished with permission.
Angie Schmitt is one of the country's best known writers and experts on the topic of sustainable transportation. She was the long-time national editor at Streetsblog. Her writing and commentary have appeared in the New York Times, The Atlantic, and National Public Radio. She is the author of Right of Way: Race, Class, and the Silent Epidemic of Pedestrian Deaths in America.
