Most of the money that the state is spending in hopes of spurring electric car sales has had no effect on the beneficiaries’ choices and, by extension, no influence on actually reducing pollution in Massachusetts, according to a new analysis of the state’s electric car rebate programs.
Since 2014, the state’s MOR-EV program has paid rebates of up to $2,500 to residents who purchase new electric vehicles, with nearly $50 million paid out as of March 2022.
The program’s chief goal is to reduce pollution by encouraging people who would otherwise have bought gasoline-powered automobiles to purchase electric cars instead.
But when asked “would you have purchased or leased your EV without the MOR–EV rebate?” 57 percent of MOR-EV beneficiaries answered “yes,” according to an independent study of the MOR-EV program’s cost-effectiveness published by Synapse Energy Economics for the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources.
The problem of “free riders” – rebate recipients who didn’t really need the state’s cash to buy their electric cars, but took the money anyhow – considerably diminishes the program’s cost-effectiveness.
As reported here previously, the vast majority of the MOR-EV program’s rebates have gone to subsidize car ownership in communities where the median income exceeds the statewide average. Some of the biggest beneficiaries, on a per-capita basis, have been wealthy, transit-accessible suburbs like Waban, Concord, Weston, and Lexington.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the study also found that free riders were more likely to be buyers of higher-cost luxury vehicles (see chart below).
“Many EVs were luxury vehicles with purchase prices of more than $50,000. Those who could afford to purchasea new, higher priced EV and chose to make that new vehicle purchase did not necessarily need the MOR–EV rebate to make that purchase,” wrote the study’s authors.
Buyers of higher-cost vehicles were more likely to be “free riders” – rebate recipients who didn’t really need the state’s cash to buy their electric cars, but took the money anyhow. Chart courtesy of the Center for Sustainable Energy and the Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources.
The Baker administration is now considering reforms to its MOR-EV programs to address some of these issues.
In 2019, administrators stopped paying rebates for cars that cost more than $50,000. The state is now proposing to reduce the price cap for eligible vehicles to $47,500 later this year, and is considering further phased reductions until the cap reaches $42,500 (for context, the current suggested retail price for a new Nissan Leaf electric car is $27,400, and the base price for a Tesla Model 3 is $46,990).
The state is also considering offering higher rebates for qualified low- and moderate-income buyers, and letting those households claim rebates when they buy used electric cars.
Streetsblog California editor Melanie Curry has been thinking about transportation, and how to improve conditions for bicyclists, since her early days commuting by bike to UCLA long ago. She was Managing Editor at the East Bay Express, and edited Access Magazine for the University of California Transportation Center. She also earned her Masters in City Planning from UC Berkeley.
"People aren't used to thinking of freeways as fossil fuel infrastructure, but they are." And once built, there's no going back, no making up for the extra driving by trying to convince people that a bus or train might be a better choice - we're stuck with it.
Transit ridership and freeway funding are up. $14 million for MicroTransit was postponed. South Bay C Line extension draws both controversy and support. Law enforcement, Taylor Swift, bus lanes, and more!
A Seattle police officer sparked outrage when he joked that the death of pedestrian Jaahnavi Kandula might be settled for as little as $11,000. Some families get even less.
Newsom vetoes bill to require a human operator in driverless truck testing on public roads; Santa Crux goes all-on for hydrogen; Why CA is taking Big Oil to court; More