Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Caltrans

Caltrans: “No Active Plans” to Widen 5 Freeway North of the 605. Really?

This morning, in an Orange County Register article - syndicated in various Southern California News Group publications including The Daily News - Caltrans spokesperson Marc Bischoff stated: “There are no (active) plans” to further widen the 5 Freeway north of the 605 Freeway.

In the article, titled Not all of the I-5 will get widened, at least for now, a reader named Rich questioned:

Do you know if there is a plan to widen the I-5 from the I-605 to the East L.A. Interchange? Once the section from the Orange County line to the I-605 is done, the section north of it will be the pinch point with only three lanes.

Screenshot of OC Register article today
Screenshot of OC Register article today
false

The OC Register's Jim Radcliffe responded:

...the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority [Metro] had wanted to widen the I-5 just north of the I-605 freeway. But nothing has come of it so far, with the plan getting shelved.

“There are no (active) plans,” said Marc Bischoff, a Caltrans spokesman.

Right now, going north, the I-5 is five lanes in each direction in Orange County and goes to three at the Los Angeles County border. But next month, a fourth lane will mostly be available for the six miles in each direction to the I-605, and then in summer 2022 a fifth lane, for carpoolers, is to open.

But in the roughly 10-mile stretch Rich mentions, from the I-605 to the East L.A. Interchange – where the I-5, the I-10, the 101 and the 60 all meet up in Boyle Heights – [the I-5] is frozen for now at three lanes each way.

Marc Bischoff is a Public Information Officer for Caltrans District 7, which includes L.A. and Ventura Counties. He is either lying or he doesn't know what his agency is doing. Updated: Bischoff, in an email to SBLA, stated that he informed the OC Register's reporter Radcliffe about the planned 5 Freeway widening project (see below) and Caltrans' statement was merely that "Caltrans does not have a separate I-5 widening project planned" beyond 5 Freeway widening currently being planned by Metro.

Last August, Caltrans and Metro announced plans to tear out hundreds of homes to widen about three miles of the 5 Freeway through the cities of Santa Fe Springs and Downey - as part of the 605 Freeway Corridor Improvement Project. Numerous parties voiced opposition to the Metro/Caltrans plan. The Metro board has not "shelved" the plan, but directed staff to include less harmful alternatives in the 605CIP environmental studies (which Metro has already spent more than $60 million on, and which Metro had scheduled to be approved in late 2020.)

Just last week, Metro presented some information about a new 5 Freeway widening alternative that would still demolish an estimated 156-182 homes in Downey.

How is this not an active plan to widen the 5 Freeway?

Streetsblog emailed Bischoff and Radcliffe and will update this article with any clarifying response they provide. 

Update 10:45 a.m. Just after posting, Streetsblog received a response from the OC Register article's author Jim Radcliffe stating "In regard to the shelved project, the spokesman said there was a Metro project to do some widening on that stretch but now other options are being looked at." Streetsblog would note that, based on last week's presentation, it would be inaccurate to term that 5 Freeway widening as "shelved."

Update 6:30 p.m. SBLA received a brief response from Caltrans' Marc Bischoff (at the end of the business day) stating "The Orange County Register reporter was informed of Metro’s I-605 / I-5 widening project and referred to Mark Dierking, Community Relations Manager with Metro, for further inquiries. Caltrans does not have a separate I-5 widening project planned." In a follow-up email Bischoff clarified "The interview with Orange County Register reporter Jim Radcliffe occurred on January 19. He was informed during that interview."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

CAHSRA Releases Environmental Documents for LA to Anaheim

The 30-mile project section runs from LAUS to ARTIC and would follow an existing passenger and freight rail corridor, passing through parts of Los Angeles County and several Orange and Los Angeles County cities including Vernon, Commerce, Pico Rivera, Norwalk, Buena Park, Fullerton, and Anaheim.

December 5, 2025

Friday’s Headlines

LA is flunking Vision Zero, but what's happening at other parts of the state?

December 5, 2025

Friday Video: Exactly Why the Cybertruck Sucks

Unwind and let yourself hate on Elon Musk a little.

December 4, 2025

California Awards More Than $140 Million of Federal Funds for Local Road-Safety Programs

The projects are aimed at supporting the governor's modest goal of reducing traffic deaths by 30% in a decade.

December 4, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines

I have a great idea on how LA can improve its crumbling infrastructure...

December 4, 2025

Talking Headways Podcast: The (Parking) Reformation

Tony Jordan, president of the Parking Reform Network, discusses getting rid of our cars, parking policy, and Donald Shoup’s legacy.

December 4, 2025
See all posts