Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In

Today, the Metro board of directors voted to spend millions of dollars to restore transit service that had recently been slashed.

Last September, facing budget difficulties under COVID, Metro cut transit service by 20 percent. At the same time, facing public criticism of the cuts, Metro's board passed a motion prioritizing restoration of service as funding became available.

Metro recently found that funding is available, as recent sales tax revenue was nearly $300 million more than Metro's budget projections. Metro staff proposed mid-year budget adjustments adding back nearly $800 million to the remaining fiscal year budget. Much of this funding is not allowed to be used to fund operations - only $58.6 million was available to fund bus service. But Metro's staff proposal directed none of this to transit operations.

Transit advocates got wind of Metro's no-new-service proposal; they weighed in urging the Metro board to fund restored bus service.

Five Metro directors - Eric Garcetti, Mike Bonin, Hilda Solis, Janice Hahn, and Robert Garcia - responded to the public outcry, authoring a motion to redirect $24.3 million towards restoring transit service "with priority for high-ridership lines and an emphasis on disadvantaged communities." In addition, the motion calls for restoring service to pre-COVID levels by no later than the end of the fiscal year (July 30), supporting vaccination of Metro's workforce, ensuring safety for Metro workers, and offering transportation assistance for getting people to vaccination appointments.

In the board discussion at today's meeting, Bonin, who has been a leading voice for transit riders, stated that there is "no greater need for this agency than to restore service." Hahn rebuked Metro staff for not addressing the board's clearly expressed priority of restoring transit service. Several directors emphasized the need for Metro transit service to support essential workers, especially as the region gradually recovers from COVID and transit ridership returns.

The board unanimously approved the motion.

Metro riders are unlikely to see an immediate uptick in service. Metro's already-slashed operations have been impacted by COVID, with illness resulting in increased absenteeism and missed bus runs. There is a lag time for Metro to hire and train new staff, and to ramp operations back up.

Investing in Place rightly called today's action "no small victory" but stressed that it is "not the end of this fight." Though $24 million will make big difference in the lives of Metro's riders, it is not even enough funding to even restore service to the same level it was at just one year ago.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

SBCTA Could Finally End One of the Country’s Worst Zombie Projects: The ONT Connector

“The ONT Connector is an inappropriate investment. Ridership capacity and public transportation utility do not support spending billions of dollars for it. Scrapping the project is the right decision. Electric rail to ONT is the appropriate decision,” writes Kevin Dedicatoria, The Transit Coalition, Community Consultant.

December 2, 2025

Your Donation Means More Today Than Ever Before

Do you want more Streetsblog? Of course you do!

December 2, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines

Los Angeles Spends a Lot of Time Fighting Not to Do Things.

December 2, 2025

Opinion: One Less Lane Ought To Fix It

Federal inaction means states must lead on reducing emissions — but their reluctance to reallocate road space for cars may doom climate goals.

December 1, 2025

Advocates React to New New Sunset Supervisor

Let's hope this Supe works out better than Beya Alcaraz.

December 1, 2025

Metro Committee Approves $7M to Tee Up 91 Freeway Widening

Metro and Caltrans anticipate spending roughly $200M to add one more westbound lane for nearly four miles through the cities of Artesia and Cerritos.

December 1, 2025
See all posts