Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In

Touting Positive Polling, Caltrain Prepares for Sales Tax Push

Note: GJEL Accident Attorneys regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog California. Unless noted in the story, GJEL Accident Attorneys is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.

It's no secret that transit agencies have been hit hard by the COVID-19 slowdown. But even as Caltrain warns that crippling cuts or even the agency's closure are possible, the agency is offering the public a chance to not only save existing service, but possibly expand and buy new trains.

A 1/8 cent sales tax measure for the San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara tri-county area could be on the November ballot that would dramatically change Caltrain's fortunes. Early polling conducted by the agency shows that the measure, which requires only 50+1% support from voters, to have support from 63% of likely voters. The measure would raise $108 million annually and be the first consistent, reliable, dedicated revenue source.

With an uncertain road to election day, the poll both provides encouragement to Caltrain supporters and a roadmap for the next several months.

"The poll shows wide swings based on messaging, with 70% in support after positive messaging, and much lower support after negative messaging. So the outcome will depend heavily on an effective campaign," writes Adina Levin, who chronicles all things Caltrain related at Green Caltrain, the blog for Friends of Caltrain.

Even with the swing, the Caltrain ballot measure attracts just over 58% of likely voters after receiving negative messaging about the measure. That twelve point swing, as well as the failure of a pair of bay area transportation funding measures on the spring ballot, is still cause for concern.

But Levin sees a way to improve the agency's chance of ballot box success.

"(the poll shows) The strongest support comes from people who were frequent Caltrain riders before the pandemic. So on the margin, Caltrain riders reaching out to their friends, neighbors, co-workers and family talking about the importance of Caltrain into the future can be powerful in what would likely be a close race," Levin continues.

Funding Caltrain has always been a somewhat confusing formula. The agency gets nearly 70% of its operating funds from fares. The rest of operations, and all of its capital budget comes from the three-member counties. Each contributes an equal amount towards the agency’s budget. However, the pact between the counties requires that each county pay an equal amount, so if one county has a budget shortfall, all three counties contribute less than expected. This instability, along with uneven contributions from other transit agencies, creates irregular budgets and makes long-term planning difficult.

Even though, advocates were concerned about increasing funding for the agency when the measure was first proposed in April because the agency did not have a strong plan in place to address equity concerns and because there were concerns that the funding would end up replacing the commitments from the counties instead of augmenting them.

However, according to Levin, the agency has been working to address both concerns.

"Caltrain has been working on studies about opportunities to improve equity and connectivity (which turn out to be closely related, since accessing Caltrain by public transit is particularly important
to lower-income riders). The poll shows that connectivity and affordability are rated very high by voters, following top priorities regarding congestion relief," Levin continues.

"Policies on equity and connectivity will be coming to the board shortly, and Friends of Caltrain wants to see the board approve strong policies that will be implemented by the ballot measure."

To put a measure on the ballot the agency needs approval from a large variety of governmental bodies. The Caltrain proposal already has legislative approval from Sacramento from a similar effort in 2017, support from two partner transit agencies' board of directors (VTA and SFMTA), and the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors. It still needs the support of San Francisco and San Mateo Board of Supervisors' as well as the Caltrain Board of Directors. All of these votes are scheduled for July, with final approval from the Caltrain Board coming on August 7th.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Port Lobbyists Trying to Kill Bike and Pedestrian Safety in Oakland

Trucking/port lobbyists want to destroy a long-established plan to build protected bike lanes connecting Jack London Square, West Oakland, and downtown

July 12, 2024

Friday Video: Take a Spin on Boston’s Electric Cargo Bike Share

Can't afford a $7,000 Urban Arrow cargo e-bike ? In Boston, you can now rent one for just a few bucks.

July 12, 2024

Friday’s Headlines

5 recommendations for high-speed rail; Caltrans, stop building new freeway lanes already; "Data bikes" can collect information about bike path conditions; More

July 12, 2024

Next Week: Active Transportation Program Workshop

The good news is that there will be a Cycle 7. But it will be small, and there will be hard choices about what gets funded.

July 11, 2024

Metro and Caltrans Still Planning 605 Expansion, Plus Four Connecting Freeways

Metro and Caltrans are planning to spend billions of dollars widening the 605, 5, 10, 60 and 105 Freeways. Really.

July 11, 2024
See all posts