Skip to content
Sponsored

Thanks to our advertising sponsor

Surprise! Even Partial Automation Is Encouraging Drivers Not to Pay Attention

Drivers using Autopilot take more and longer trips, and also surf the internet and take naps while at the wheel.
Surprise! Even Partial Automation Is Encouraging Drivers Not to Pay Attention
Video footage of a Tesla driver testing out the survivability of nap driving.

Among the many dangers faced by people on streets in this nation today, distracted driving in automated vehicles has not been uppermost in people’s minds. But research from U.C. Davis suggests policymakers should maybe pay a little more attention.

Scott Hardman, Senior Researcher at the Plug-In Hybrid & Electric Vehicle Research Center at ITS-Davis, found that people who drive Teslas that are equipped with the company’s “Autopilot” software tend to drive more than they did before they had the software, which by itself is a problem in terms of energy use and increased congestion. Reduced stress from the feeling that they don’t need to concentrate on driving makes drivers more willing to take long trips, and more willing to drive in heavy traffic.

That’s because they are also more likely to be surfing the internet or sleeping while at the wheel, trusting the unregulated and largely untested software to handle the driving.

The Tesla with “Autopilot” function is considered a “partially automated vehicle.” The software can control steering, acceleration, deceleration, and braking. However, the human driver is supposed to stay attentive, and maintain control of the vehicle.

The research raises questions about how driver behavior might change when more advanced automated vehicles become available. Researchers have warned that the adoption of fully automated vehicles is likely to lead to more travel and more congestion, and this study’s results seem to back that up.

“The study highlights the fact that partially automated vehicles can cause and are already causing changes in how people travel—similar to the changes that modeling studies predict for fully automated vehicles,” said Hardman in a press release. “But partially automated vehicles, unlike fully driverless cars, are already on the market and having an impact.”

Neither federal nor state policies currently address these safety issues directly, even though fully automatic vehicles are already being tested on California roads.

Hardman’s report is available online, (a summary of findings is here). Also, U.C. Davis will host a webinar at 10 a.m. tomorrow to discuss the findings in more detail.

Researchers at U.C Davis have done a lot of thinking about automated vehicles and what they could mean for the future of transportation in California. Policy makers and rule setters should listen.

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog California

Tuesday’s Headlines

April 28, 2026

Are U.S. Cities Ready for the Robo-Taxi Revolution?

April 27, 2026

Streetsblog Reviews Last Weeks California Bike Summit, Part 1: Advice on Living with Caltrans

April 27, 2026

San Francisco Celebrates One Year of Sunset Dunes

April 27, 2026
See all posts