Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
LA Metro

Metro Board to Vote on Pasadena-to-North Hollywood Bus Rapid Transit

Note: Metropolitan Shuttle, a leader in bus shuttle rentals, regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog Los Angeles. Unless noted in the story, Metropolitan Shuttle is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.

Tomorrow, the Metro board will vote on the planned North Hollywood to Pasadena Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project. The board is expected to approve staff recommendations that call for a primarily street-running route, setting aside an alternative that would have run mostly on freeways.

The NoHo-Pasadena BRT project will extend eighteen miles, connecting the North Hollywood Red/Orange Line station to the Gold Line in Pasadena. The project has $267 million in funding, all from Measure M, which specifies a 2020 groundbreaking and an opening by 2022-2024. It is on the 28 by 2028 list of projects anticipated to be completed for the 2028 Olympics.

Metro has been exploring two primary alternatives: freeway-running and street-running - as well as hybrid versions that combine portions of each.

NoHo Pasadena preliminary freeway-running alternatives
NoHo Pasadena preliminary freeway-running alternative map - via Metro

The not-favored freeway-running alternative would have mostly followed the 134 Freeway. The routing is similar to the existing 501 express bus, which sees fairly low ridership, at about 1,400-1,500 daily boardings on weekdays. Metro's analysis showed that this route would have a shorter end-to-end travel time, but would miss connecting to many local destinations, hence have low ridership.

NoHoPasadena BRT early street-running route concepts - map via Metro

Several options were under consideration for a route that runs primarily on streets.

Metro's analysis comparing NoHo-Pasadena BRT alternatives
Metro's analysis comparing NoHo-Pasadena BRT alternatives - via Metro

Over the past year, Metro held meetings to receive community/stakeholder input. Metro refined various routing choices within the two main alternatives, and completed an alternatives analysis (summary, full report.)

Overall, though street-running is a little slower, and costs a little more, it is expected to attract nearly 30,000 daily riders. Freeway running and partial-freeway alternatives would only draw 23,000 to 26,000 daily riders.

NoHo-Pasadena BRT preferred street-running alternative - via Metro

Metro staff have recommended the street-running alternative (above) including Olive Avenue, Glenoaks Boulevard, Colorado Boulevard, and two short stretches on the 134 Freeway: from NoHo into Burbank and in Pasadena just east of Eagle Rock. This alignment would connect with the downtown Burbank Metrolink station and pass within easy walking distance of the Gold Line Memorial Park Station in Pasadena. Some final alignment refinements are still to be decided in the environmental clearance phase. The environmental studies will also determine what BRT features will be included, such as dedicated bus lanes and/or signal prioritization.

Tomorrow, the full Metro board will vote on moving forward with the Environmental Impact Report, with the street-running alignment as the preferred alternative.

At last week's Metro board Planning and Programming Committee Pasadena Mayor Terry Tornek had commented that it could be problematic to extend the BRT east of the Gold Line. Staff's current proposal recommends that the line terminate at Pasadena City College, about a mile and a half east of the Gold Line, but Tornek said that this would duplicate existing bus service on Colorado Boulevard. He said that extending a dedicated bus lane there would be a "terrible mistake" presumably due to parking and/or car lane removal.

Note that some service redundancy (say, between a rail station and a nearby community college) is a good thing for transportation. Roads and Freeways work pretty well in proximity to each other. And, if the city won't prioritize riders, it may still make sense to extend the line to PCC without a full dedicated lane.

Responding to Tornek's concern, Metro staff recommended studying two options: one ending at PCC and one at the Gold Line.

Boardmember John Fasana proposed proceeding, though ending the route at the Gold Line as requested by Tornek. Boardmember Paul Krekorian favored keeping options on the table in the environmental review. Ultimately the committee sent the item to the full board to decide.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Port Lobbyists Trying to Kill Bike and Pedestrian Safety in Oakland

Trucking/port lobbyists want to destroy a long-established plan to build protected bike lanes connecting Jack London Square, West Oakland, and downtown

July 12, 2024

Friday Video: Take a Spin on Boston’s Electric Cargo Bike Share

Can't afford a $7,000 Urban Arrow cargo e-bike ? In Boston, you can now rent one for just a few bucks.

July 12, 2024

Friday’s Headlines

5 recommendations for high-speed rail; Caltrans, stop building new freeway lanes already; "Data bikes" can collect information about bike path conditions; More

July 12, 2024

Next Week: Active Transportation Program Workshop

The good news is that there will be a Cycle 7. But it will be small, and there will be hard choices about what gets funded.

July 11, 2024

Metro and Caltrans Still Planning 605 Expansion, Plus Four Connecting Freeways

Metro and Caltrans are planning to spend billions of dollars widening the 605, 5, 10, 60 and 105 Freeways. Really.

July 11, 2024
See all posts