Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Log In

Councilmember Gil Cedillo Proposes E-Scooter Ban in His District

10:32 AM PST on March 6, 2019

Are these shared e-scooters really a serious threat to pedestrian safety? Photo by Joe Linton/Streetsblog L.A.

This article supported by Los Angeles Bicycle Attorney as part of a general sponsorship package. All opinions in the article are that of the author, and do not necessarily reflect those of LABA. Click on the ad for more information.

Last Friday, L.A. City Councilmember Gil Cedillo introduced a motion that would exclude his council district from the L.A. Transportation Department's (LADOT's) citywide dockless e-scooter pilot program starting in a couple weeks. Alongside Paul Koretz and Mitch Englander (who has since left the council) this makes three of fifteen councilmembers who have called for a ban on the popular new shared e-scooters.

Several cities in L.A. County have banned e-scooter; these include Beverly Hills, West Hollywood, Redondo Beach, and El Segundo. A proposed ban in unincorporated L.A. County was recently scaled back to a proposal to develop e-scooter regulations.

Councilmember Cedillo has a long history of opposing multi-modal transportation, including the city's Mobility Plan and North Figueroa Street bike lanes. He also blocked the striping of bikes lanes that the city received funding for in its North Spring Street Bridge retrofit project.

Cedillo's e-scooter motion (council file 17-1125-S6) states that:

A growing number of health and safety issue [sic] have been reported in cities across the nation. Numerous media stories have been published about the increasing number of emergency room visits by people injured when riding electric scooters.

...many cities are struggling with scooters that are haphazardly parked along sidewalks and parkways, thereby obstructing access for pedestrians and people in wheelchairs.

(Note that the jury is still out on the prevalence and severity of e-scooter injuries and that the big danger for scooter riders is cars, a problem that Cedillo has failed to address.)

The motion concludes that "Until LADOT’s one-year pilot has concluded it would be fitting to limit the locations where the electric scooters can operate." If approved by the full City Council, the motion instructs LADOT "to exclude Council District 1 from the Dockless On-Demand Personal Mobility pilot program and to not issue any permits for this area."

Since late 2017, LADOT has been working on crafting regulations for dockless shared mobility devices, including dockless bike-share, e-bikes, and e-scooters. LADOT staff worked closely with the city council, city departments, and various stakeholders. Cedillo did not raise issues with e-scooters during the many city hearings on e-scooter regulations and, in September 2018, Cedillo voted to approve LADOT's final dockless regulations, anticipated to be a one-year pilot. Though parts of the city had been excluded from early limited, conditional operations (which are currently in effect), pilot dockless regulations were approved to go into effect citywide on March 15. Later this month, Angelenos are likely to see an increase in dockless mobility devices, as LADOT reports having received applications from eleven dockless mobility companies requesting permits to operate 37,670 devices.

One fairly obvious problem with Cedillo's proposal is that e-scooter riders cannot easily tell where one district begins and ends. Another could be potential repercussions from mobility device operators that were invited to apply for citywide operations.

Cedillo's motion appears to be too late to make it through the city's approval process prior to the March 15 start date for the citywide dockless pilot.

Cedillo's motion has been assigned to the city council Transportation Committee, chaired by Councilmember Mike Bonin, who has been supportive of multi-modal transportation options for all Angelenos. It is not clear that Bonin would agree to schedule the motion at T-Committee any time soon, nor whether it would be approved by the three-member committee, which consists of Bonin, Koretz, and Nury Martinez. E-scooter critic Koretz could try to jump onto Cedillo's initiative by excluding Koretz's district five, too, further splintering the citywide pilot. If the Cedillo motion is passed by the committee, it would also need approval of the full city council.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Op-Ed: Why Is Fare Evasion Punished More Severely than Speeding?

A.B. 819 offers California the opportunity to decriminalize fare evasion and replace punitive measures with more equitable approaches.

September 21, 2023

Eyes on the Street: Slow Streets in South Pasadena

The city has a sampler platter of quick-build temporary traffic calming installations to experience for the rest of the year

September 21, 2023

Thursday’s Headlines

The joys and risks of walking; Why is Fresno building so much parking? How much will breaking the law cost if you get caught by a speed camera? More

September 21, 2023

Metro Board Looks to Approve $65 Million for 91 Freeway Widening Projects

Metro staff are recommending the board approve funds to support two 91 Freeway expansion projects located in pollution-burdened communities in Southeast L.A. County - in the cities of Long Beach, Artesia, and Cerritos

September 20, 2023
See all posts