Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Congestion Pricing

Metro Board Approves Studies of Congestion Pricing and TNC Fees

Today, the Metro Board of Directors approved studying two new transportation programs that help reduce congestion while raising revenue: congestion pricing and taxing ride-hail trips.

The board has been kicking around congestion pricing for a few months now; it was initially raised as a way to generate some funding to help complete transportation projects in advance of the 2028 Olympics. See earlier Streetsblog coverage for background on:

Metro's road pricing initiative, now called "The Re-Imagining of L.A. County," is a 12-24 month feasibility study of congestion pricing, including a strategy for addressing equity.

Today's motion approving a study doesn't mean that pricing will sail through tomorrow and be immediately imposed on the hard-working bloodmobile driver. Even in approving the studies, many Metro boardmembers continued to express concerns and skepticism. Metro CEO Phil Washington reassured the board they would still have "several more bites at the apple." In the coming months, the board will review the study's scope, award the study contract, and ultimately decide whether to proceed with any congestion pricing program proposed.

The motion also approved "exploring fees" for ride-hail (Lyft, Uber - also called TNCs - Transportation Network Companies) trips. A couple of boardmembers expressed the concern that ride-hail fees should go to local cities. Chief Innovation Officer Joshua Schank responded that Metro would be working together with local municipalities to build a coalition for a TNC fee.

A separate 28 by 2028 motion decoupled congestion pricing and ride-hail revenues from Olympics project acceleration. The motion directs Metro to continue to get projects ready for acceleration, while "prioritiz[ing] low-risk revenue sources," including state and federal monies.

While today's approvals represent small steps forward for congestion pricing, TNC fees, and project acceleration, time will tell what will actually get implemented.

For additional coverage of these approvals, see: The Source, Urbanize, and Curbed.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

SBCTA Could Finally End One of the Country’s Worst Zombie Projects: The ONT Connector

“The ONT Connector is an inappropriate investment. Ridership capacity and public transportation utility do not support spending billions of dollars for it. Scrapping the project is the right decision. Electric rail to ONT is the appropriate decision,” writes Kevin Dedicatoria, The Transit Coalition, Community Consultant.

December 2, 2025

Your Donation Means More Today Than Ever Before

Do you want more Streetsblog? Of course you do!

December 2, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines

Los Angeles Spends a Lot of Time Fighting Not to Do Things.

December 2, 2025

Opinion: One Less Lane Ought To Fix It

Federal inaction means states must lead on reducing emissions — but their reluctance to reallocate road space for cars may doom climate goals.

December 1, 2025

Advocates React to New New Sunset Supervisor

Let's hope this Supe works out better than Beya Alcaraz.

December 1, 2025

Metro Committee Approves $7M to Tee Up 91 Freeway Widening

Metro and Caltrans anticipate spending roughly $200M to add one more westbound lane for nearly four miles through the cities of Artesia and Cerritos.

December 1, 2025
See all posts