Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Streetsblog LA

Committee Approves Motion Directing LADOT to Further Study Rowena

This story sponsored by Los Angeles Metro to remind readers of traffic pattern changes resulting from Purple Line Construction. Unless noted in the story, Metro is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.

This afternoon the L.A. City Council Transportation Committee approved a motion (council file 11-2130-S4) directing the Transportation Department (LADOT) to further study the feasibility of projects outlined in the recent Rowena Avenue study.

A half-mile of Silver Lake's Rowena Avenue received a road diet safety upgrade in 2013. Crash statistics show that Rowena is safer, but some vocal stakeholders have pushed to undo the diet. City Councilmember David Ryu paid $88,000 for a Kimley-Horn study of cut-through traffic in the Silver Lake neighborhood surrounding the Rowena road diet. Safe Streets advocates are concerned that the study includes options that would undo the safety improvements.

Introduced in September, Ryu's motion would direct LADOT and the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) to report on feasibility and estimated costs of projects planned in the Kimley-Horn report.

Folks affiliated with Keep Rowena Safe were critical of the Ryu motion for not explicitly prioritizing safety. Ryu recently responded to this concern in a clarifying letter stating "any and all recommendations and/or improvements place the safety of Silver Lake residents first and foremost."

At today's committee meeting, public comment included nine stakeholders who spoke in favor of keeping the road diet - calling it "empirically safer," a "life-saving project" and a "really great success." No one spoke against the road diet.

Committee chair Mike Bonin questioned LADOT staff about the scope of their feasibility study and whether it includes evaluating safety. LADOT Assistant General Manager Dan Mitchell responded affirmatively, stressing that "safety is always top priority." LADOT General Manager Seleta Reynolds echoed Mitchell's statement, adding that making side streets safer does not require any changes to Rowena.

The committee approved the motion, which puts it in the queue to go to the full council. If approved by council, LADOT and BOE would report back in 90 days.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

California And Ten Other Friends Go to Battle with Trump Over EV’s

The plaintiffs in the suit are California, Colorado, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington.

June 13, 2025

Friday’s Headlines

Today's headlines are dominated by the shocking assault on California by the federal government,

June 13, 2025

Talking Headways Podcast: Creating Positive Soundscapes in Cities

Chris Berdik on health and wellbeing, how our brains process sound and creating positive urban soundscapes.

June 13, 2025

Eliminating Municipal Parking Requirements Does Not Equate To Zero-Parking Homes

No, the Blumenfield-Raman parking reform motion will not result in a proliferation of "parking-free developments"

June 12, 2025

SFMTA Leaves Valencia Bike Lanes Unfinished

The center-running lane is long gone and some finishing touches are coming to the parking-protected section from 15th to 23rd, but the lack of concrete infrastructure remains problematic. And then there's the last four blocks from 23rd to Cesar Chavez, which is still just a striped lane wedged between parked cars and moving traffic.

June 12, 2025

Op/Ed: California’s Momentum on Transportation Emission Reductions Stops Here?

California policymakers have a number of tools at their disposal to help address the weakening of the very climate policies they put in place.

June 12, 2025
See all posts