Skip to content
Sponsored

Thanks to our advertising sponsor

Committee Approves Motion Directing LADOT to Further Study Rowena

Safe streets advocates fear that Councilmember Ryu's motion could lay groundwork for undoing Rowena Avenue road diet safety improvements.
Committee Approves Motion Directing LADOT to Further Study Rowena

This story sponsored by Los Angeles Metro to remind readers of traffic pattern changes resulting from Purple Line Construction. Unless noted in the story, Metro is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.

This afternoon the L.A. City Council Transportation Committee approved a motion (council file 11-2130-S4) directing the Transportation Department (LADOT) to further study the feasibility of projects outlined in the recent Rowena Avenue study.

A half-mile of Silver Lake’s Rowena Avenue received a road diet safety upgrade in 2013. Crash statistics show that Rowena is safer, but some vocal stakeholders have pushed to undo the diet. City Councilmember David Ryu paid $88,000 for a Kimley-Horn study of cut-through traffic in the Silver Lake neighborhood surrounding the Rowena road diet. Safe Streets advocates are concerned that the study includes options that would undo the safety improvements.

Introduced in September, Ryu’s motion would direct LADOT and the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) to report on feasibility and estimated costs of projects planned in the Kimley-Horn report.

Folks affiliated with Keep Rowena Safe were critical of the Ryu motion for not explicitly prioritizing safety. Ryu recently responded to this concern in a clarifying letter stating “any and all recommendations and/or improvements place the safety of Silver Lake residents first and foremost.”

At today’s committee meeting, public comment included nine stakeholders who spoke in favor of keeping the road diet – calling it “empirically safer,” a “life-saving project” and a “really great success.” No one spoke against the road diet.

Committee chair Mike Bonin questioned LADOT staff about the scope of their feasibility study and whether it includes evaluating safety. LADOT Assistant General Manager Dan Mitchell responded affirmatively, stressing that “safety is always top priority.” LADOT General Manager Seleta Reynolds echoed Mitchell’s statement, adding that making side streets safer does not require any changes to Rowena.

The committee approved the motion, which puts it in the queue to go to the full council. If approved by council, LADOT and BOE would report back in 90 days.

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog California

The Week in Short Videos

April 17, 2026

Friday’s Headlines

April 17, 2026

Mayor Gloria’s Budget Has Deep Cuts for Safety and Bicycle Program for the San Diego Department of Transportation

April 16, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines

April 16, 2026

Pasadena Adopts Most of the 710 Stub Vision Plan

April 16, 2026
See all posts