Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Transportation Funding

Reports Quantify Benefits of Gas Tax Investments for California, Regions

The recently passed gas tax increase, S.B. 1, will add an annual $18.3 billion to the California economy, according to an analysis released by the American Road and Transportation Builder Association (ARTBA).

ARTBA, of course, has a stake in the outcome of the threatened repeal of S.B. 1, since many of the jobs created by the measure are going to its members. Still, the reports it commissioned on the economic impacts of the gas tax increase are a compelling argument in favor of investing in infrastructure.

The original report, available here, was released in February, and yesterday ARTBA released several new reports focused on specific regions of the state. Its analysis evaluates the economic benefits to individuals and the state, including new jobs, savings on vehicle repairs, and cost savings from improved safety conditions. It also includes increased economic activity from purchasing materials, in-state spending on goods and services by those with new jobs and new business, and additional income and sales tax revenue to the state.

S.B. 1 is expected to bring in an average of $5.2 billion annually over the next decade in increased revenue from gas taxes and fees, so the report's estimate of $18.3 billion annually in direct and indirect benefits to the state's economy and its residents is a pretty big return.

The report estimates there will be new jobs in many sectors, not just transportation and construction, including agriculture, mining, utilities, manufacturing, trade, information, real estate, health care, and others. The report also outlines other less easily quantified benefits, such as quality of life, safety and comfort levels for all road users, and improvements in cities and towns.

The report goes into detail about why and how these investments improve overall state economic health, including increasing access to goods and services, reducing production costs, increased efficiencies, better emergency management, fostering innovation, and the like. Benefits to individuals include household savings from reduced vehicle maintenance and better access to alternative transportation, as well as better transit travel times and reliability.

The new regional reports put numbers on benefits specific to Orange, Los Angeles, San Diego and Imperial counties, the Inland Empire, the San Francisco Bay Area, and the San Joaquin Valley.

That's not a bad return on an additional twelve cents a gallon and a realistic vehicle registration fee. And no, the gas tax is not the only--or even the main--reason gas is more expensive in California than elsewhere.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Thursday’s Headlines

What the heck is the Montana exemption? I guess I don't spend much time on luxury car news sites.

March 26, 2026

Why Cities Need More “Agile” Streets

When projects are routed through a full capital-improvement workflow, solutions tend toward expensive, permanent interventions - not alternatives that might achieve 80 percent of the benefit at 10 percent of the cost.

March 25, 2026

Op-Ed: Let’s Make Transit Work for Marin

This time of change is an opportunity to make Marin County more transit oriented in new ways.

March 25, 2026

Streets for All: SoCal Could Fund All of Southland’s High-Speed Rail with EIFD

Streets for All report shows that all of SoCal High-Speed Rail could be funded with EIFD's, with money leftover to support local transit.

March 25, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

More news on legislation and transit funding as Mayor Bass skips a Streets for All forum. Also: No Kings.

March 25, 2026

Eyes on the Street: Progress on Folsom Streetscape Project

One of SoMa's major thoroughfares is getting long-overdue repairs that will include bike and ped safety improvements.

March 24, 2026
See all posts