Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Streetsblog USA

Albuquerque Hits a New Low With Cruel Response to Pedestrian Deaths

The Albuquerque City Council isn’t interested in fixing intersections like this, where a driver killed a pedestrian last week. Photo: Google Maps

The lengths that lawmakers will go to avoid doing anything substantive for pedestrian safety would be comical, if the consequences weren't so serious.

In New Mexico, drivers have killed 51 people walking so far this year. But rather than using its resources to rein in speeding, failure to yield, distracted driving, or other driver behaviors that maim and kill, Albuquerque City Council is using its resources to -- get ready for this -- harass people who panhandle on the side of the road.

City Council Member Trudy Jones sponsored legislation making it illegal to both beg for money from motorists and for motorists to interact with pedestrians. The bill is called the "Pedestrian Safety Ordinance," and Jones claims it would "make our streets safer and curbs safer," but it's a transparent attempt to use traffic safety as a fig leaf to cover constitutional issues with panhandling bans. The council passed it unanimously.

In an embarrassing editorial this weekend, the Albuquerque Journal defended the legislation as a boon to public safety even though there's absolutely zero evidence that it addresses the causes of pedestrian injuries and deaths.

Meanwhile, last week, a driver struck and killed a pedestrian at the intersection shown above. If the City Council truly cared about protecting pedestrians, it would allocate resources to fix this kind of high-speed street design. By laying blame at the feet of the city's most vulnerable people, council members are shirking their own responsibility to make streets safer,

Good grief. (Thanks to reader Khalil Spencer for bringing this to our attention.)

More recommended reading today: Writing at Medium, Darin Givens explains how the Braves' new suburban stadium is totally out of reach for anyone who relies on transit. And BikePortland reports that the Senate GOP's tax bill does away with a modest benefit for bike commuters while retaining the much larger and more destructive parking benefit.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Streets for All: SoCal Could Fund All of Southland’s High-Speed Rail with EIFD

Streets for All report shows that all of SoCal High-Speed Rail could be funded with EIFD's, with money leftover to support local transit.

March 25, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

More news on legislation and transit funding as Mayor Bass skips a Streets for All forum. Also: No Kings.

March 25, 2026

Eyes on the Street: Progress on Folsom Streetscape Project

One of SoMa's major thoroughfares is getting long-overdue repairs that will include bike and ped safety improvements.

March 24, 2026

D.C. Advocates Sue To Save Key Bike Lane From Trump Teardown

We previously reported that the Trump administration might soon move to dismantle key cycle tracks in the nation's capital. Unfortunately, we were right.

March 24, 2026

Monrovia Seeks Input on Draft Bike Master Plan

The deadline for public comment is this Friday, March 27 2026.

March 24, 2026

Santa Rosa Quietly Approves Additional Mall Parking in Pedestrian and Art Plaza; Activists Appeal

“Why do they need more parking? It feels like they’re trying to sneak something by the public.’’

March 24, 2026
See all posts