Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Streetsblog USA

America Spends $7.3 Billion a Year Paying Affluent People to Drive to Work

Photo: TransitCenter

Every day, the streets of American cities are more clogged and polluted at rush hour because the federal government pays people to drive to work.

The culprit is the commuter tax benefit, a $7.3 billion annual subsidy that mainly offsets parking costs for people who drive to work. The people who benefit the most are high earners who drive into the U.S.'s biggest, most congested cities and can write off the maximum $255 per month in tax-free income.

The tax break for car commuters is not only regressive, it also generates traffic at exactly the worst time -- rush hour -- and in exactly the worst places -- the central areas of major cities, according to a new study from TransitCenter and the Frontier Group [PDF].

Transit center graph
A model developed by Andrea Hamre at Virginia Tech shows the massive effect of commuter subsidies on mode choice in major American cities. Graphic: TransitCenter
false

Placing a finger on the scale of people's commute decisions can have a profound influence on behavior. A model developed by Virginia Tech researcher Andrea Hamre estimates that in five cities -- Washington, DC, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Newark, NJ, and New York City -- a subsidy solely for parking at work would reduce transit's share of the commuting pie 25 percent compared to a scenario with no commuter subsidy.

The federal government does allow transit commuters up to $255 a month in pre-tax income to offset the cost of fares. But people can claim it only if their employer offers the benefit. The parking subsidy is much more widely used -- the government spends $7.3 billion a year on it, compared to $1.3 billion for transit.

Cities would be better off if both subsidies were eliminated. TransitCenter estimates that without the commuter tax benefit, 66,000 fewer people would drive to work in the 25 largest U.S. cities.

As long as the commuter benefit persists, local governments can at least help even the playing field. A number of cities, including New York, DC, and San Francisco, have ordinances requiring most employers to offer the transit benefit to their workers.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Tuesday’s Headlines

Katie Porter throws her hat in the ring for governor, and other news from up and down the Golden State.

March 11, 2025

How Highways Rend Our Social Fabric — and the Challenge of Mending It

Roads are supposed to connect us. So why do so many highways tear our social networks apart?

March 10, 2025

State Announces Nearly $300 Million in Grants for Safe Streets

Reflective paint and better lighting? Sure, that's great. A dozen new protected bikeways in six municipalities and at UC Santa Cruz? Yes, please.

March 10, 2025

Eyes on the Street: Santa Monica Bergamot Station First/Last Mile Construction

New protected bike lanes and crosswalks are open on 26th Street - more upgrades under construction The post Eyes on the Street: Santa Monica Bergamot Station First/Last Mile Construction appeared first on Streetsblog Los Angeles.

March 10, 2025

Call to Action: Transbay Coalition Pushes Back Against AC Transit Fare Hikes

Advocates want your help keeping the bus affordable in Alameda County The post Call to Action: Transbay Coalition Pushes Back Against AC Transit Fare Hikes appeared first on Streetsblog San Francisco.

March 10, 2025
See all posts