Skip to content
Sponsored

Thanks to our advertising sponsor

Metro Board Votes to Kill 710 North Freeway Tunnel

This morning the Metro board of directors voted to approve a motion that effectively kills the $6 billion 710 North freeway tunnel project and redirects its funds to soundwalls, resurfacing, transit, signals, and bicycle and pedestrian improvements.
Metro Board Votes to Kill 710 North Freeway Tunnel
Metro passed the Fasana motion effectively killing the SR-710 North freewau tunnel. Map via Metro

This morning the Metro board of directors voted to approve a motion that effectively kills the $6 billion 710 North freeway tunnel project. Under a motion introduced last week by board chair John Fasana, the Metro board supported putting several hundred million project dollars towards soundwalls, resurfacing, transit, signals, and bicycle and pedestrian improvements instead. These will be in the cities of Pasadena, South Pasadena, Alhambra, La Cañada Flintridge, and the 90032 zip code, which is mostly the neighborhood of El Sereno within L.A.

Since last week, Fasana retooled his motion to ensure that projects in the central region (for this project, largely El Sereno and East L.A.) receive a fair share of funding.

Streetsblog readers likely know that, since the 1960s, there has been disagreement about closing the gap in the 710 freeway, with some pressing to finish the freeway and others fighting against it. See today’s L.A. Times for a recap of the long history of the project.

The issue brought out a large number of people offering public comment. Two hours of public testimony saw a majority of voices against the tunnel, although numerous speakers supported it. Representatives of the cities of Monterey Park, Alhambra, and Rosemead spoke in favor of the tunnel. Representatives from South Pasadena, La Cañada Flintridge, and Sierra Madre spoke against. Numerous residents from El Sereno and East L.A. opposed the tunnel and urged that their areas get a fair share of any 710 North funds that would be reallocated.

There was no board opposition to the motion, though several boardmembers acknowledged that the decision does have winners and losers. Some boardmembers acknowledged that communities at the stub ends of the freeway are facing adverse impacts from high volumes of traffic they experience. Long opposed to the tunnel, Glendale Councilmember Ara Najarian nevertheless said that “no one should gloat about this.”

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog California

Group of E-Bike Regulation Bills Advance in Assembly

April 22, 2026

For Earth Day, the Trump Administration Wants To Expand Highways Across America

April 21, 2026

Op/Ed: Oil Shocks Will Keep Coming. High-Speed Rail Can Boost Our Resilience. 

April 21, 2026
See all posts