Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Streetsblog LA

L.A. Metro Could Kill 710 North Freeway Tunnel

If the Metro board passes Fasana’s motion, the 710 Freeway project could be dead. Map via Metro

At this morning's Metro board Ad Hoc Congestion, Highway and Roads Committee, board chair John Fasana introduced a motion that, if approved by the full board next week, could spell the end of efforts to extend the 710 freeway north via a $6 billion tunnel.

The 710 freeway extension has been pushed, and pushed back against, since the 1970s. That it has not been built is a testament to community freeway fighters' ceaseless efforts. The project was partially funded in Measure R in 2008. Opposition to the 710 was sufficiently strong to have Metro leave it out of the subsequent 2016 Measure M, and even to include a proviso in M to restrict funds from going to the project.

Today's committee item appeared to be a routine "receive and file" action. Metro staff reported that they were expecting to complete the project's $50 million Environmental Impact Report (EIR) by the end of 2017, with Caltrans expected to select a preferred alternative in early 2018. Staff reported that only about twenty percent of the project is funded, about $1 billion of $5.8 billion. Staff projected about 50 percent of the funding to come from future tolls.

The public comment was lengthy, with more than a dozen commenters on each side. Proponents continue to assert that building the $6 billion tunnel would reduce congestion and improve air quality, though, of course, no freeway project has ever delivered these results.

After some board discussion, chair Fasana, who has been supportive of the 710 in the past, said that "the path has run out to get this thing built," and he introduced a motion that would effectively kill the freeway tunnel. Fasana's motion would put Metro on record as supporting a Transportation System Management/Transportation Demand Management (TSM/TDM) as the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA). According to the motion, this would bring "timely implementation of cost-effective transportation improvements," essentially focusing the remaining 710 North funds on smaller-scale improvements such as soundwalls, resurfacing, transit, signals, and bicycle and pedestrian improvements in the cities of Pasadena, South Pasadena, Alhambra, La Cañada Flintridge, and the 90032 zip code (largely the L.A. City neighborhood of El Sereno).

The motion was opposed by County Supervisor Janice Hahn, who said she found it troubling to "break promises" to voters. Boardmember Jacquelyn Dupont-Walker pushed to have the decision go to the full board. Ultimately it was approved on a 3-2 vote, with Fasana, Ara Najarian, and Kathryn Barger in favor, and Hahn and Dupont-Walker against.

This sets up a big showdown for the full board's decision on the motion at its May 25 meeting.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

SEE IT: How Much (Or How Little) Driving Is Going on in America’s Top Metros

Check it out: The lowest-mileage region isn't the one you'd think.

April 16, 2024

Tuesday’s Headlines

Protests shut down roads, bridges; Data comes in on "turbo" roundabout; What we've learned from 8 years of scooters; More

April 16, 2024

Monday’s Headlines

Why drivers block sidewalks instead of parking in their garages; Santa Rose police easily nab distracted drivers; Cars are $$$$; EV owners are making electricity cheaper for everyone; More

April 15, 2024

CA High-Speed Rail Takes a Step Towards Acquiring Trains

The contract calls for two prototype trainsets for testing to be delivered by 2028, and four trainsets to be used on the "early operating segment" between Merced and Bakersfield, ready between 2030 and 2033.

April 12, 2024
See all posts