Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
CA Air Resources Board (CARB)

California Sues to Defend Auto Emission Rules

What the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards could achieve, if they were allowed to do their job. Image from the old Whitehouse.gov (archived)

Donald Trump's promise to roll back “industry-killing regulations” and “job-crushing taxes” on the auto industry, in concert with a suit from the Automobile Manufacturers against new fuel efficiency standards, got a strong rebuke from California Governor Jerry Brown. In a letter to US Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt, Brown didn't mince words:

“President Trump’s decision today to weaken emission standards in cars is an unconscionable gift to polluters. Once again, you’ve put the interests of big oil ahead of clean air and politics ahead of science,” he wrote.

Despite automaker's charge that the standards are too difficult for them to meet, wrote Brown, research shows the opposite is true. He attached several reports backing up his claim.

Also, he wrote, the US EPA's own analysis showed that the new standards would:

  • Save consumers more than $1,650 per vehicle.
  • Reduce oil consumption by nearly 40 billion gallons of refined gasoline and diesel fuel.
  • Decrease greenhouse gas emissions by 540 million metric tons.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra also filed a motion in federal court to block a suit filed Monday by the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers that claimed the new standards for 2025, originally adopted in 2012, were too hard for them to meet.

“Your action to weaken vehicle pollution standards – standards your own members agreed to – breaks your promise to the American people,” wrote Brown in a separate letter.

Advances in fuel efficiency technology have worked for everyone. They have saved Americans money at the pump, cut oil consumption, reduced air pollution and helped fight climate change. Putting this progress at risk is reckless. Your actions could . . . increase our dependence on foreign oil.

Brown made it clear that California won't sit back and watch the standards be degraded from the sidelines. “Please be advised that California will take the necessary steps to preserve the current standards and protect the health of our people and the stability of our climate,” he wrote.

The EPA standards under threat from Trump and the automakers' suit are the same ones in force in California. They were formulated with significant input from the EPA, California's Air Resources Board, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and the automakers themselves.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

UCLA Study Shows How Ambiguous Definition of “Major Transit Stop” Creates Wiggle Room for Municipalities

This is a story of how well-intentioned efforts by the state to tie new development to transit hinge on how local governments (with their own incentives) interpret broad state law.

March 19, 2026

Metro Committee Again Sides with Nimbys, Postpones Key North K Line Rail Decision

The committee postponing approval empowers anti-rail nimbys opposed to Metro tunneling far deep beneath homes.

March 18, 2026

California Must Stop Expanding Highways 

While transit, bike, and safety projects struggle for funding, the state keeps writing blank checks for freeway widening boondoggles. It's time to tell our lawmakers: enough!

March 18, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

Is that Ralph Vartabedian's music?

March 18, 2026

Opinion: The Federal Railroad Administration’s Proposed Amtrak Restructuring is Worth Considering

The federal push to overhaul Amtrak operations is promising, but it must be done with care.

March 17, 2026
See all posts