Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Streetsblog LA

Vision Zero Program Struggles to Change L.A. City Priorities

LADOT and LAPD are clear on the diagnosis: speeding kills Angelenos. Their prescription is less clear. Chart via LADOT Vision Zero safety study

It was never going to be easy to shift Los Angeles decision-makers attitudes to care more about keeping people alive than about moving cars. Nonetheless, L.A.'s mayor and city council have approved the city's Vision Zero policy, and directed city departments to work together to, over time, reduce L.A. traffic fatalities to zero.

L.A. traffic fatalities for all modes. Pedestrians continue to be highly overrepresented
L.A. traffic fatalities for all modes. Pedestrians continue to be highly over-represented. Graph via LADOT Vision Zero Safety Study
false

Unfortunately, the recent trend is worse. 2016 data shows increased fatalities across all road user categories, with pedestrians rising the most steeply in the past year. At today's Transportation Committee meeting to LADOT General Manager Seleta Reynolds asserted that the L.A. figures match an overall national trend. Though nobody knows definitively, Reynolds suggests that the recent uptrend is caused by more driving as a result of a good economy and low gas prices, coupled with more distractions. Reynolds was quick to add that only San Francisco and New York City have bucked that national trend, and that those cities have some of the nation's most mature Vision Zero efforts.

Reynolds, along with other LADOT and LAPD representatives, was presenting on the LADOT's recently released Vision Zero Action Plan.

The plan has recently come under criticism from the L.A. County Bicycle Coalition, Biking in L.A. and the L.A. Vision Zero Alliance. LACBC criticizes LADOT's lack of specifics regarding facilities:

[The plan] lacks a clear vision for making the streets safer for people who ride bicycles [and] does not deliver bold goals for expanding the bicycle network... The plan also mentions adding cycle tracks to priority corridors, but nothing of implementation.

Further, the LACBC critiques LAPD enforcement in communities of color:

[T]he City cannot claim to be committed to equity unless it is willing to explicitly address race, racial profiling, and enforcement without racial profiling.

The City’s commitment to unbiased policing falls short in explicitly addressing racial profiling in policing and fails to acknowledge the disproportionate enforcement that is presently aimed at communities of color... An action plan that fails to explicitly, affirmatively, and positively state this is a plan without true vision, honesty, and an ability to take into account the very real realities that people of color in this country face.

The Vision Zero Alliance critique echoes the LAPD profiling point, calling specifically for "adopting a 'no profiling' pledge, as Portland did in its Vision Zero Action Plan" and using a data-driven enforcement approach similar to the San Francisco Police Department’s City Performance Scorecards for “Focus on the Five” reporting, where SFPD specifically prioritizes ticketing the top five offenses that lead to the greatest loss of life.

The Alliance further critiques the lack of city funding behind Vision Zero and the city's failure to address speeding, calling for "a more comprehensive set of actions to address local control of speed limits and the implementation of engineering projects specifically intended to slow traffic."

Vision Zero Alliance representatives - from L.A. Walks, LACBC, Multicultural Communities for Mobility, and Investing in Place - testifying before today's Transportation Committee meeting. Photo by Joe Linton/Streetsblog L.A.
Vision Zero Alliance representatives - from L.A. Walks, LACBC, Multicultural Communities for Mobility, and Investing in Place - testifying before today's Transportation Committee meeting. Photo by Joe Linton/Streetsblog L.A.
false

Unfortunately LADOT's plan takes a lot of words and charts to say very little. There is not a lot of there there. When traffic engineers plan highways, the plans say which houses will be torn down and how many lanes will be built. When LADOT plans to reduce traffic fatalities, they list 40 key corridors where something unspecified might happen.

To a large extent, LADOT is hemmed in by several recalcitrant councilmembers who have blocked planned safety improvements. Even in today's meeting, Councilmember David Ryu repeatedly expressed more concerns safety projects causing neighborhood cut-through traffic than he did about loss of life.

If the LADOT's vision zero program sounds non-committal, the LAPD's non-efforts are worse. LAPD representatives spoke in platitudes about safety being a department wide priority, community outreach, and bias-free policing. LAPD pledged to provide more data to LADOT (though not necessarily to the public) in the future when the department upgrades its records management system in a couple months.

Committee chair councilmember Mike Bonin did a noble job of pressing LADOT and LAPD to commit to real action to save lives threatened by traffic violence. Under Bonin's direction, city vision zero efforts will return to the Transportation Committee in 60 days for additional reporting, including:

    • LADOT reporting back on project implementation, funding needs and community engagement
    • LAPD reporting on adopting programs similar to SF's Focus on the Five and Portland's "no profiling" pledge

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Encouraging Seniors to Use Active and Public Transportation

Using - and encouraging the use of - active and multimodal transport can greatly enhance people's lives, especially seniors

July 17, 2024

SFMTA Approves Merchant-Driven, ‘Holistic’ Plan for West Portal

SFMTA board again fails in its role to put transit, safety, and city wide interests above parochial politics

July 17, 2024

Study: More Evidence That Safer Streets Help Local Business

...and more insight into why the belief that they would harm business is so hard to quash.

July 17, 2024

Wednesday’s Headlines

Is the solution to an unsafe crosswalk to just remove it? National data about pedestrian deaths has huge gaps; CA's grid passed the heat wave test; More

July 17, 2024

Don’t Believe the Hydrogen Train Hype

Calling hydrogen-powered trains "zero emission" is misleading at best - and even if they were, they lost the race to be "first" a long time ago

July 16, 2024
See all posts