Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Streetsblog USA

The Case for a Tax on Parking Lots

Even a booming city like Seattle still has a lot of land tied up in parking lots. Photo: The Urbanist

Parking lots make cities less walkable, bikeable, and transit-friendly. They crowd out space for housing. They erode the tax base.

A few American cities have special taxes on surface parking lots that create an incentive for redevelopment, and Seattle is one of them. The trouble is, says Doug Trumm at The Urbanist, Seattle's parking lot tax should be higher. Here's why:

Seattle last raised the commercial parking lot tax in 2010 in order to help fund the Mercer Street project and the Seawall replacement on Elliott Bay. Increasing the tax 2.5% raised $5.4 million that year.

Councilmembers Kshama Sawant and Nick Licata proposed raising it again in 2014 to prevent Metro cuts, but Mayor Ed Murray succeeded in getting his plan passed to increase the sales tax and vehicle license fees to close the gap. Those councilmembers contended that increasing the Commercial Parking Tax from 12.5% to 17.5% would raise $13 million that year. We should raise the tax more aggressively to encourage the conversion of surface parking lot properties and encourage housing production even as the housing market cools off a bit.

In effect, a parking lot tax would work like a limited version of a land value tax, which is a property tax levied on the value of the land rather than the improvements. For some market urbanists, a land value tax is the holy grail because of the incentive to redevelop low-value parcels it’d create. Unfortunately, converting to a land value tax is politically fraught and a pure land value tax may fall unfairly on low-income and middle class households. Back in 2014, Sightline Institute did a series on land value taxes (LVT) and their feasibility in Washington state. Their findings suggested a carefully worded LVT could square with the State Constitution’s tax uniformity clause. But constitutionality doesn’t make a land value tax politically likely.

The surface parking lot excise tax could take the place of a LVT and likely extract one of the biggest benefits: converting the lowest value uses for land to higher uses, and it’s hard to get much lower than a surface parking lot in a dense urban environment. Many surface parking lots in Seattle are already controlled by developers who are biding their time for the right moment to build (and some have already pounced). This tax would reduce speculation and nudge them in the right direction so that the wider Downtown area including Lower Queen Anne, Belltown, South Lake Union, and First Hill would have fewer parking craters.

More recommended reading today: Seattle Transit Blog looks at how car congestion slows down buses and imposes huge costs on transit riders. And BikeWalkKC reports on the light sentence for the driver who killed cyclist Glenda Taylor.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Eyes on the Street: Caltrans Protected Bikeway Near SD Freeway

Caltrans is the white hat. It's San Diego that messed up.

March 27, 2026

The Week in Short Videos

CTC Loves Highways, Streets for All Loves High-Speed Rail, and Streetsblog Loves Long Beach!

Friday’s Headlines

Sales taxes, rail extensions, bike lanes, and more...

March 27, 2026

Friday Video: Five Bike Advocacy Mistakes You Don’t Even Know You’re Making

For one thing, make sure that political leaders who say "no" to livable streets experience consequences for their decisions.

March 26, 2026

Metro Board Unanimously Advances K Line North Light Rail Extension

Mayor Bass backed off of her push for indefinite delays requested by some mid-city residents opposed to tunneling under their homes.

March 26, 2026

Transit Agencies Mark Progress as Ballot Efforts Intensify

Help gather signatures for the funding measures during this weekend's demonstrations.

March 26, 2026
See all posts