Dallas Council Member: Texas Poised to “Compound Errors of the Past”
The entire Texas highway machine — suburban real estate moguls, the construction industry, the governor, and the legislature — is pushing voters to approve Prop 7, a constitutional amendment that would mandate spending $2.5 billion in state sales tax revenue on un-tolled roads. The highway interests are telling Texas voters in unison that this measure, if approved in November, will fix congestion and not cost them any extra money — claims that don’t stand up to the slightest scrutiny.

But there hasn’t been much pushback against the story that Prop 7 backers are selling. The Dallas Morning News’ Brandon Formby reported that the only voice of political opposition is Dallas City Council Member Philip Kingston, who represents downtown.
I spoke with Kingston this week about why he thinks Prop 7 is going to be terrible for the state. Here’s our Q&A, edited for length and clarity.
I read in the Dallas Morning News that you — and only you — have some concerns about Prop 7.
Yeah, the Dallas Morning News said I’m the only person in Texas opposed to it.
It is incredibly bad policy. It got worse recently. The governor issued a directive saying the money from Prop 7 is to be directed at the worst areas of highway congestion in the state. We already know what those are: Those are massive double-decked highway projects inside urban areas.
We’re going to compound the errors of the past with all kinds of new money.
And this is going to negatively impact your constituents?
I represent downtown. We have the most congested roads in the city. The way that people have proposed to fix it is to increase lane miles. It’s just going induce demand, reduce air quality, and perpetuate the suburban hellscape.

It’s existential for us. We’ve seen what highways have done to our city. We’re not going to take it anymore. The more we’ve looked at these issues, the more it appears highway planning has ruined Dallas’s chances of becoming an urban city. Why won’t they listen to us?
Do you have any idea what projects might happen?
One is the Woodall Rodgers Freeway right to the heart of [my] district. We built a park over it [right]. I hope that’s enough to scare them away.
What would you rather see the money spent on?
I’d love to have that money for transit if we’re going to keep it in the transportation space. Two bigger needs are education and mental health.
These guys in the legislature, they’re bought and sold by the highway lobby.
We have never reached attainment for air quality in Dallas — ever. We’re never going to get there.
Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.
More from Streetsblog California
OpEd: Separating Substance from False Solutions, E-bike and E-moto Activity in Sacramento
Monday’s Headlines
Can This Tool Predict Where Your City’s Next Car Crash Will Happen?
L.A. Bus Lane Enforcement Camera Citations Generated Nearly $20 Million Last Year
Public service announcement: never never ever park a car in a bus lane or at a bus stop! You will get a $293 citation. It's not worth it. Don't park in the bus lane.
The post L.A. Bus Lane Enforcement Camera Citations Generated Nearly $20 Million Last Year appeared first on Streetsblog Los Angeles.