Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
CA State Assembly

Sign CalBike’s Petition to Eliminate Parking Requirements Near Transit

Update, June 2: A.B. 1401 passed the Assembly 51-17 and will now go through the Senate process.

Despite the many many words that have been written about the ways that minimum parking requirements increase the costs and difficulty of building affordable housing, create more parking than needed, and encourage more driving just when everyone should be figuring out how to drive less, there is still organized opposition to A.B. 1401. This bill would simply prohibit a city from requiring a set minimum number of parking spots in places well-served by transit.

The League of California Cities and other groups continue to oppose the bill because of fears that it would remove a tool cities rely on to get affordable housing units included in projects. That is, the Density Bonus law allows cities to require less parking in exchange for more affordable housing on a case-by-case basis.

So basically the League and its partners want to keep a harmful requirement so it can be used as a bargaining chip.

But evidence suggests that simply removing parking minimums leads to more affordable housing being built - certainly more than is built under Density Bonus law. For more on why, see previous Streetsblog coverage.

Where similar relaxations of parking requirements have already been done - in San Diego and downtown Los Angeles - removing parking minimums has led to a bit less parking being built overall, as well as significantly less expensive costs to build housing, including affordable housing. Developers can better adjust to individual circumstances like lot size, housing type, and local context if the decision is left up to them, whereas minimum parking requirements force them to strictly adhere to a set number of parking spots per size of unit, no matter what.

The California Bicycle Coalition recognizes the importance of encouraging alternative means of travel and dedicating less space to cars, and is asking for signatories on its petition in support of A.B. 1401, here.

Writes CalBike:

Today, most places in California require developers to set aside massive amounts of space for car parking, even in new housing supported by great transit service. Streets that should be inviting to people walking and biking are made unfriendly by parking garages and increased traffic. We are forced to sacrifice plentiful housing for people to build housing for cars.

A.B. 1401 is not a blanket prohibition against all parking minimums; it applies only to places with good transit.

It's time to set aside opposition based on old ways of doing things.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Next Week: Active Transportation Program Workshop

The good news is that there will be a Cycle 7. But it will be small, and there will be hard choices about what gets funded.

July 11, 2024

Metro and Caltrans Still Planning 605 Expansion, Plus Four Connecting Freeways

Metro and Caltrans are planning to spend billions of dollars widening the 605, 5, 10, 60 and 105 Freeways. Really.

July 11, 2024

Six Reasons Why Native Americans Have the Highest Rate of Pedestrian Deaths

American Indians and Alaska Natives consistently report the highest rates of pedestrian deaths per capita. A recent panel unpacked why, and what to do about it.

July 11, 2024

Thursday’s Headlines

Santa Maria has new transit routes, expanded service; Amtrak was surprised at the success of its new east coast intercity route; CA approves offshore wind plan; More

July 11, 2024
See all posts