Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In

SFMTA planners apparently still think sharrows, the bane of safe-streets advocates, represent an actual safety measure. "Bicyclists are safe in shared lane" declared a callout in a just-released SFMTA video about curb management on 10th Street, a major arterial with four lanes of fast-moving traffic plus two parking lanes.

The SFMTA's callout was brought to Streetsblog's attention via a twitter thread started by bike safety advocate Scott Feeney. Here's the video in question:

The callout is at 1:57.

The fallacy of painting a sharrow on a large arterial and calling it "safe" has been studied and written about again, again, and again. More amazingly, this stretch of 10th Street, a ground-level freeway masquerading as as a city street, is actually a suggested bike route from SFMTA.

Feeney was absolutely right to add that "I initially saw a still frame without context and assumed it was from decades ago when people used to have mistaken ideas about what's acceptable bike infrastructure. It's shocking SFMTA still thinks this is OK in 2021."

Streetsblog would add that it's shocking that anybody ever thought it was okay.

10th Street. The "sharrow" marking is barely visible, off to the left. Image: Google Streetview

"Even as the City continues to fill gaps in our protected bike lane network in SoMa and beyond, streets like Tenth show just how much work remains. We need streets that serve the neighborhoods and communities that surround them, not as freeway onramps for people on their way to somewhere else," wrote the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition's Brian Wiedenmeier, in an email to Streetsblog.

Feeney, meanwhile, hopes SFMTA will learn from the crass callout in the video and the blow back it earned and install some real safety measures on 10th. He told Streetsblog that the "...obvious long-term solution should be a two-way cycle track the entire length of 10th. It connects to a bike lane at both its north (Polk) and south (Potrero) ends, yet SFMTA would have us “wiggle” over to 11th and back for no reason, in a clear second-class treatment of bicycles versus freeway-bound cars and trucks."

Streetsblog has emailed SFMTA and Supervisor Haney's office for comment and will update this post.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Port Lobbyists Trying to Kill Bike and Pedestrian Safety in Oakland

Trucking/port lobbyists want to destroy a long-established plan to build protected bike lanes connecting Jack London Square, West Oakland, and downtown

July 12, 2024

Friday Video: Take a Spin on Boston’s Electric Cargo Bike Share

Can't afford a $7,000 Urban Arrow cargo e-bike ? In Boston, you can now rent one for just a few bucks.

July 12, 2024

Friday’s Headlines

5 recommendations for high-speed rail; Caltrans, stop building new freeway lanes already; "Data bikes" can collect information about bike path conditions; More

July 12, 2024

Next Week: Active Transportation Program Workshop

The good news is that there will be a Cycle 7. But it will be small, and there will be hard choices about what gets funded.

July 11, 2024

Metro and Caltrans Still Planning 605 Expansion, Plus Four Connecting Freeways

Metro and Caltrans are planning to spend billions of dollars widening the 605, 5, 10, 60 and 105 Freeways. Really.

July 11, 2024
See all posts