Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In

Note: GJEL Accident Attorneys regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog California. Unless noted in the story, GJEL Accident Attorneys is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.

Muni is planning to stave off post-lockdown gridlock by creating emergency bus-only lanes and consolidating lines to improve speed, capacity, and reliability. The agency is also rejiggering rail lines to improve reliability and move more people, more efficiently, under constrained budgets.

But if this is all being done as a desperate, gridlock-averting emergency, why is nobody yet talking about signal preemption for trains, something other transit agencies have long taken for granted?

In the lead image, a Portland light rail vehicle (LRV) approaches an intersection. But unlike in San Francisco, that train will not stop. Instead, bells ring, lights flash, and gates come down, stopping all cross traffic so the train can continue through, "preempting" cross traffic. One can see the same thing in San Diego, where on most of the LRV lines trains trigger crossing gates and trains speed through intersections, unencumbered by cross traffic.

"Muni's lack of any signal preemption or crossing gates for its light rail network is a big impediment to speed and on-time performance for trains. When you look at light rail across the US and around the world, locations like St. Francis Circle, by the Stonestown Galleria, the T Third, and along the N and L lines in the Sunset should be signalized with traffic lights, preemption, and crossing gates as appropriate," wrote Dennis Lytton, a Bay Area rail expert with decades of experience managing and operating train systems.

The most egregious examples of the way trains are delayed and slowed by this lack of preemption in San Francisco is at the aforementioned Stonestown Galleria, where M Ocean View trains wait several minutes for cross traffic, including left-turning cars, to enter a mall.

View from inside an inbound M-Oceanview waiting behind a few motorists turning left into the Stonestown Galleria. Photo: Streetsblog/Rudick
The view from inside an inbound M-Oceanview waiting behind a few motorists in a turn pocket, going left into the Stonestown Galleria. Photo: Streetsblog/Rudick
false
In addition to crossing gates, "...not allowing car traffic to use that left turn onto Winston drive just seems basic," opined Cat Carter of the San Francisco Transit Riders about the Stonestown Galleria entrance. And for people who want to get into the mall: "People coming from the south can just hop over to Junipero Serra... cars have the options of taking different routes, trains do not."
And then there's the crossing at St. Francis Circle, where M and K trains both wait for cross traffic for several minutes. There's also the entrance to the West Portal tunnel itself. "It's really strange to see a train stop for a four-way stop sign. You just seldom see that anywhere else in the world," said Lytton. And let's not even get started on all the delays caused to the T Third by the level-of-service designed crossings all along the line. But all of Muni's surface lines are greatly slowed and made unreliable by the lack of signal preemption.

"The fixes are relatively easy engineering-wise," added Carter, who also wants to see minor intersections on 3rd Street closed and crossing gates added at major intersections for the T line, not to mention cars banned from the train right of way for much of the route. "It would make a huge difference for riders."

Even Los Angeles has gates that preempt cross traffic on much of its light-rail system, seen here in Pasadena. Photo: LA Metro
Even Los Angeles has gates that preempt cross traffic on much of its light rail system, seen here in Pasadena. Photo: LA Metro
false

Cheryl Brinkman, a ten-year veteran of the SFMTA board, said crossing gates never come up in conversations with staff. However, she agreed that the M Ocean View line, where it has its own right-of-way from Sloat to Junipero Serra, is probably the most sensible place to install them. The cost would be quickly recouped by the money saved by having better, more reliable run times. "When transit isn't stuck in traffic, it saves money," said Carter. "Service hours cost millions of dollars."

"I know it's something I would support," said Brinkman.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

CAHSRA Releases Environmental Documents for LA to Anaheim

The 30-mile project section runs from LAUS to ARTIC and would follow an existing passenger and freight rail corridor, passing through parts of Los Angeles County and several Orange and Los Angeles County cities including Vernon, Commerce, Pico Rivera, Norwalk, Buena Park, Fullerton, and Anaheim.

December 5, 2025

Friday’s Headlines

LA is flunking Vision Zero, but what's happening at other parts of the state?

December 5, 2025

Friday Video: Exactly Why the Cybertruck Sucks

Unwind and let yourself hate on Elon Musk a little.

December 4, 2025

California Awards More Than $140 Million of Federal Funds for Local Road-Safety Programs

The projects are aimed at supporting the governor's modest goal of reducing traffic deaths by 30% in a decade.

December 4, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines

I have a great idea on how LA can improve its crumbling infrastructure...

December 4, 2025

Talking Headways Podcast: The (Parking) Reformation

Tony Jordan, president of the Parking Reform Network, discusses getting rid of our cars, parking policy, and Donald Shoup’s legacy.

December 4, 2025
See all posts