Central Valley to Get a Diverging Diamond Interchange
Note: GJEL Accident Attorneys regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog California. Unless noted in the story, GJEL Accident Attorneys is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.
California’s first Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI), a traffic design engineers say will reduce collisions and improve traffic flow, is coming to the Central Valley.
The DDI will replace an existing interchange on SR 120 at Union Road in Manteca, in San Joaquin County. That part of the city contains a popular shopping and entertainment center, as well as new housing development, and more growth is expected into the future. Improvements at this crossing have been in various planning stages for over fifteen years.
A recent groundbreaking ceremony marked the beginning of construction on the DDI, and it is expected to be completed by the end of 2020.
The DDI, said Caltrans District 10 Director Dan McElhinney at the groundbreaking, “slows everybody down but gets everybody mobile.” That is, it keeps cars moving through a complicated merging pattern instead of requiring them to stop at an old-fashioned intersection.
It also avoids interactions between cars and other road users by removing pedestrians and bicyclists from the roadway. Instead, engineers will build a long, looping, separated path for them, dropping down into a short tunnel to cross under the road and then climbing up to the interchange to cross over the highway at the same level as vehicle traffic.
The basic concept of a DDI is that motorists enter from the right side of the road, cross over to the left side as they go through the interchange, and then cross back again to the right to exit (see a simulation here). Engineers love the design because it supposedly improves traffic flow by removing the need for traffic signals at on and off ramps. They also say its diverging diamond shape will prevent congestion by reducing stopping points.
Koosun Kim, deputy director of Public Works for the city of Manteca, said one of the main reasons that a DDI design was chosen is because it is expected to reduce collisions. The existing interchange has 26 potential conflict points; the DDI design has only fourteen of them.
While proponents of DDIs tout safety for car occupants, others say that they demonstrate blindness to the actual experience of bicyclists and pedestrians trying to get across.
Kim said concern for the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists is why the city decided to build a separate path for them.
“If you look at what it’s like right now–it’s very dangerous for children,” he said. There is a school located on one side of the existing interchange and a shopping center and movie theater on the other. Children often cross the interchange on the only currently available space, which is the shoulder.
Usually DDIs locate pedestrian walkways in the median or along the sides of the road, and place bicycle lanes next to vehicle traffic. The Manteca DDI will instead include a separate twelve-foot-wide bridge on the east side of the overpass. To get through the interchange, pedestrians and bicyclists will have to drop down from street level, follow a tunnel under the freeway ramps, then climb upward on a circular path to the bridge, where they will cross over with vehicle traffic, but behind some kind of barrier. Then they will have to repeat the sequence, backwards, on the other side, as illustrated in the top image.
A staircase will be provided as a shortcut for pedestrians who want to avoid the longer ADA-compliant loop. Security measures, including cameras, lighting, and emergency call buttons, will be added to the tunnel.
The design is inspired by one at Highway 50 and Watt Avenue near the American River in Sacramento.
For bicyclists and pedestrians, the trip across the interchange will be about twice as long as it is for vehicles, and that much longer than the current, dangerous shoulder crossing.
The project will also encourage more and faster vehicle traffic in other ways. It will widen SR 120, building “auxiliary lanes” from Airport Way to Main Street, and widen Union Road to four lanes between Daniels and Lifestyle streets.
The city of Manteca is fully funding the project with a combination of Redevelopment Agency funds (the interchange improvement was assigned RDA money before the agency was dissolved), local development fees, and Measure K, the half-cent sales tax approved by San Joaquin County voters.
DDIs have been built around the country, but this will California’s first. Manteca’s design is expected to be the model for other California cities that are considering similar construction projects. There are at least four in the works: in Modesto, San Bernardino, Ceres, and San Diego.
Caltrans hopes so. “We hope to see many more like this,” McElhinney said at the groundbreaking.
10 thoughts on Central Valley to Get a Diverging Diamond Interchange
While I was being employed by my past organization I was on the search for reputable work from home opportunities from which I can earn decent money and additionally get plenty of time to put in with my family and offcourse I am not seeking for scams that misguide you to make you very very rich in just few days or so. Ultimately I came across a terrific opportunity and I can’t tell you how delighted I am these days. The great things about doing work from internet are: Your Office Can Be Anywhere- you’re not bound to your home. You can take good care of your job on a trip, having fun in the great outdoors , or perhaps listening to your favorite band at a live music show. And you can also save on food stuff expenses because you’ll easily be able to whip up your own dinner and coffee when you working at home. Your Schedule Can Be Your Own: A lot of the work that can be done remotely these days can also be executed on a very flexible schedule. If you do have to work specific hours, you’re certain to still have some break time—time you can utilize however you’d like! Even if you have just ten mins, you can do something which just wouldn’t be possible in a traditional office: bust those samba moves, enjoy a few tunes on your guitar, or even take a relaxing power nap. You’re guaranteed to get back feeling a lot more energized than you would after 10 mins at your desk surfing Fb. You Can Learn More and Become More Self-dependent:Because you don’t have colleagues just a few feet away or a tech team 1 floor down, you’ll find yourself building the skill of looking for your own answers and becoming more proactive to find what you need on your own. Of course you can still ask questions and also get help if you need to. But, a lot of the time, you can do a Google search, download a free guide. Here’s the means with which to begun —-> chu.pe/6N7
I’ve ridden my bike across the Sacramento bicycle crossing on Watt Ave over US 50 that’s mentioned in this article. It’s not great (very long) but it does feel safe and ideal for this kind of interchange. Not sure how I feel about the pedestrian setup, though.
This design is a perfect example of how engineers build roads to be “safer” by making them easier–and more fun–for drivers to zoom through at high speed. Just following the various potential routes through this interchange with your eyes shows how much those smooth, minimal curves encourage drivers to travel through without slowing down. It looks futuristic, but it’s backwards. Or call it “futuristic” from a midcentury, not to mention dystopian, perspective. California needs a different kind of vision for safety.
Caltrans engineers could have designed a separate pedestrian/bike overpass like the one that spans I-80 in Berkeley near University Avenue. That would have cost more money, but in Caltrans’ mind, pedestrians and bicyclists are not worth spending money on, so they come up with a least-cost solution.
Sad and ridiculous how far these engineers expect people to walk – along a loud polluted highway, even. I expect that pedestrians in a hurry will use the (very dangerous) roadway.
The distance of that too wide crossing is even longer for people biking or walking than it is for people driving. It’s almost as if the people designing it never plan on using it.
So at either end, if you’re going westbound, how are you supposed to get to or from that on a bicycle? This seems worse than just planning a little wider median on the DDI and providing a protected bike lane.
Something tells me that Thielges and I are compatriot cynics.
Planners rarely do it right the first time. They must have been educated in the great American system where learning something is frowned on. Otherwise, billions of dollars could have been saved. Tell that to Raygun and his cronies.
If the goal is to get bicyclists and pedestrians out of the way of cars then it would be cheaper and more effective to just build a wall topped with razor wire across the bike/ped path. And more honest.
Comments are closed.