Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Safety

WRONG! Safety Officials Think Tech Gadgets Will Save Pedestrians from Monster SUVs

Traffic safety officials, under pressure to do something amount the mounting epidemic of pedestrian deaths, are making some tentative first moves to force carmakers to prioritize safety for those on foot.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety announced it would begin testing pedestrian-detection systems and assigning ratings to vehicles based on their performance. The group hopes to encourage automakers to make such equipment standard, which could reduce crashes as much as 35 percent.

Unfortunately, it appears the group is ignoring the elephant in the room: The rise of SUVs, whose design itself is contributing to soaring pedestrians deaths. Indeed, the IIHS testing does not look at the impact of bumper height or shape or vehicle weight on pedestrians in crashes — but merely assesses the pedestrian-detection technology. In other words, even the leading traffic safety groups are not willing to warn the public about the inherent dangers of SUVs to pedestrians.

Of the 12 vehicles tested, four ended up being ranked "Superior" in the detection tests. Three are SUVs, even though SUVs are two-and-a-half to three times more likely to kill pedestrians than sedans, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

A spokesman for IIHS said the pedestrian-detection technology is the greatest hope for saving the lives of the innocent because, alas, "SUVs and pickups are not going away."

"IIHS has taken the position that technology is the most realistic way to reduce pedestrian risk from the vehicle side," said the spokesman, Russ Rider.

The new ratings will be part of the IIHS's "Top Safety Pick" rankings next year, which Automotive News calls a "highly coveted" distinction.

About a third of 2019 vehicles include the pedestrian-detection systems, which deploy sensors that apply the brakes automatically if they detect people. Another third of cars offered the system as an option. The IIHS says it reduced pedestrian crashes 35 percent on vehicles that have the system. The agency estimates it would reduce pedestrian crashes 65 percent if it were widely deployed and improved.

Meanwhile, there's been no decisive action from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the federal agency responsible for regulating vehicle safety on protecting pedestrians. Some rules were proposed late in the Obama Administration that would have begun to phase in pedestrian safety impacts, but those rules have not moved forward under President Trump's anti-regulatory Transportation Department.

Pedestrian deaths have increased almost 50 percent since 2009, which many advocates see as a national health emergency.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

CAHSRA Releases Environmental Documents for LA to Anaheim

The 30-mile project section runs from LAUS to ARTIC and would follow an existing passenger and freight rail corridor, passing through parts of Los Angeles County and several Orange and Los Angeles County cities including Vernon, Commerce, Pico Rivera, Norwalk, Buena Park, Fullerton, and Anaheim.

December 5, 2025

Friday’s Headlines

LA is flunking Vision Zero, but what's happening at other parts of the state?

December 5, 2025

Friday Video: Exactly Why the Cybertruck Sucks

Unwind and let yourself hate on Elon Musk a little.

December 4, 2025

California Awards More Than $140 Million of Federal Funds for Local Road-Safety Programs

The projects are aimed at supporting the governor's modest goal of reducing traffic deaths by 30% in a decade.

December 4, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines

I have a great idea on how LA can improve its crumbling infrastructure...

December 4, 2025

Talking Headways Podcast: The (Parking) Reformation

Tony Jordan, president of the Parking Reform Network, discusses getting rid of our cars, parking policy, and Donald Shoup’s legacy.

December 4, 2025
See all posts