California Needs More Bike Ticket Diversion Programs
Mr. L's story shows how ineffective and harmful just handing out tickets to bike riders can be
Note: GJEL Accident Attorneys regularly sponsors coverage on Streetsblog San Francisco and Streetsblog California. Unless noted in the story, GJEL Accident Attorneys is not consulted for the content or editorial direction of the sponsored content.
Andrew Yip of BikeSanGabrielValley (BikeSGV) recently tweeted out a thread about a bike rider who got a ticket for riding on the sidewalk. A recent immigrant, he didn’t understand why he had been stopped, and had to wait around for the police to find a translator to explain it to him.
According to Yip, the man—Mr. L–makes little money although he works six days a week, and the citation was going to cost him at least $240. When he finally got a translator and was able to go to court, he explained that he couldn’t afford to pay the fine. “I am low income and the fine is worth five times my bike’s worth,” Yip says Mr. L told him later. “It’s one thing that I forego a day’s wages as a form of a life lesson, but that’s too much money for me. That’s several days plus the time off work to go to court.”
Recent immigrant came into BikeSGV the other day. He received a ticket. Didn't know why he was stopped and had to sit around and wait for a translator from the PD. Apparently he got ticketed for riding on the sidewalk. Low income and works 6 days a week. Citation = at least $240
— Andrew Yip (@yiptastico) October 3, 2018
The court’s response was an “offer” to serve jail time. “If you are poor, then you go to jail? I didn’t hurt anyone. How is this punishment fair?” Mr. L asked.
Luckily for him, this happened in the city of El Monte, where BikeSGV has worked with the courts to set up a program that lets ticketed riders take a bike class in lieu of paying a fine. These diversion programs are common for ticketed car drivers, but few exist for bicyclists despite the 2015 passage of a law allowing them.
Mr. L’s experience highlights the dire need for such programs. “”My bike is worth $40,” he told Yip. “The sidewalk riding citation is $197, and I have to take time off to go to court. How can you fine someone a citation that’s worth more than their bicycle that they rely on to get around?”
Once he learned about the class, it still wasn’t easy for Mr. L to find it. He speaks both Chinese and Vietnamese, but doesn’t read either of those languages, so he can’t use email or even online maps. He tried for three weeks to find BikeSGV’s location, until finally he happened upon Yip in the parking lot of the former grammar school where the offices are housed. Another stroke of luck for Mr. L: Yip speaks Chinese.
BikeSGV offers regular bike education courses, based on the League of American Bicycle curriculum. Their 3-hour class covers laws that apply to bikes and how to ride safely on urban streets. Their instructors speak Spanish, Chinese, and English, and the classes are paid for by grants from Metro. They are free to participants, and open to the public.
They were set up as an educational program, and not every student in them is there because they got a ticket. But those that are receive a verification letter once they complete the class, and they take it back to the court to get their fines waived.
Mr. L’s experience was no fluke. BikeSGV keeps track of its student’s citations: what they’re for, the size of fines, and the ages of the people cited. According to Yip, about half of the people with tickets are youth, and “a good chunk are homeless, or low-income; some are day laborers,” he said. “They’re getting fines that are eight, nine times the worth of their bike—and that’s all they have.”
“My colleague Jose has worked with dozens of people who get citations and go through his class,” he said. The worst case was a youth that received a fine of $960 for riding a bike on the sidewalk without a helmet while wearing earphones—and, said Yip, for riding the wrong way on the sidewalk, “which isn’t even a thing.”
“These are people that ride not because it’s fun or for recreation–this is the way they have to get around,” said Yip. He said it’s a problem of the so-called “invisible bike rider” that no one sees and therefore no one believes exist. “They ride early in the morning and late at night—that’s why you never see them. But their bikes are behind the restaurants. They work in kitchens, hotels, retail, construction…They bike to work because they don’t own a car.”
“It’s a question of equity,” said Yip. “We’re very passionate about this because we see how these citations can be a huge burden for people.”
Another key point to remember is that the education program is providing people with important information. It’s not just new immigrants who don’t understand traffic law. With driver education disappearing from school curriculums, young Californians pick up what they know about navigating the streets as much from observation as from any official program. It’s not a good educational model, and the supplemental education—maybe from LaughALot Traffic School after receiving a ticket—can be weak.
But people don’t necessarily break the law because they don’t know about it. Yip’s tweet thread includes Mr. L’s explanation for riding on the sidewalk: he “already knew the rules of the road, but his reasoning for riding on the sidewalk was because it was dangerous to ride on the street,” he wrote. There are no bike lanes where he needs to ride, so where is he supposed to go? “I understand it is illegal to ride on the sidewalk but sometimes I feel safer to do that instead of on the streets with speeding cars. They don’t even look around here,” said Mr. L.
“Ride on the street or you’ll get fined several days worth of your wage/jail. Not safe? Too bad, no bike lanes for you. Go get a car,” wrote Yip. “We might be fearful of biking in traffic, but if you’re poor, you worry about that AND the possibility of losing a lot of your hard-earned money. This means livelihood, a place to live, or food on the table. All because you just want to bike and stay alive while doing it.”
Mr. L’s experience shows that more diversion programs like BikeSGV’s are clearly needed. Right now, few cities have them. The state—and cities and courts and police departments—are relying on local advocacy groups to push to make them happen, instead of leading the way. And while BikeSGV—and Bike East Bay, the San Francisco Bike Coalition, the Marin County Bicycle Coalition, Bike Bakersfield, and other advocacy organizations throughout the state—along with a few cities like Sacramento and Huntington Beach are running successful educational programs, there are many more parts of the state that have nothing.
And even in those areas it’s a lot to ask local advocacy groups to figure it out. If there’s no champion on the staff at the police department or court, it can be difficult to get anyone interested. BikeSGV has had success in El Monte largely because there is a single judge who oversees the traffic court there who has been an enthusiastic supporter. They have had less luck with other cities or court systems, such as in West Covina, where eight or nine judges share traffic court duties and staff have been unresponsive.
But handing out citations is not the ideal way to educate people, and it remains a hardship for some even when the fine can be waived. As Yip points out, you still need to factor in that people work, and taking time off to get to court–twice–can mean losing a chunk of income. For people just barely getting by, that could be devastating.
“It’s better to provide education–and to just fix the streets–than to ticket people,” said Yip. “They’re riding on sidewalks because they don’t feel safe. You can’t blame them.”
Mr. L was able to complete the course and get his fine waived. But he still has to ride his bike on the dangerous streets to get to work.
22 thoughts on California Needs More Bike Ticket Diversion Programs
I got stopped a couple of months ago riding my bicycle, Did not have my DL on me. The cop asked for name, DoB, and called it in and verified my information. No way I could have given false information.
i disagree. most people know the rules. they still ignore them. I seen many cyclist blow through street lights on red. the only way they learn is via citations. the classes may work the first time for a few. but for many, they are repeat offenders
I’ll change it. Kinda liked this exchange, though 🙂
I really can’t argue with that.
Well, yeah, that’s pretty obvious. It is up to the individual to judge what he/she is willing to risk. For me, I was tired of hearing of local police engaging in ticket blitzes on bicyclists, instead of enforcing speeding, reckless driving, pedestrian right of way violations, and nearly constant stop violations by motorists. My city’s pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities have not budged, despite much Vision Zero blather. Accepting a spurious ticket in such a blitz just pushed me over the edge, and I found myself lying like I’d been born to it. To this day, I don’t regret doing what seemed morally right, even if illegal.
Andrew, I am not speaking to this man’s experience at all, only about my own. I leave it to others to decide what works for them.
I got a $350 ticket for a U-turn. No traffic anywhere near me but didn’t see the sign prohibiting it. I think I then had to pay another $150 or so for the safety course. It felt like a racket.
Dunno if Melanie can change it but you get what I’m saying in the article. 🙂
Ah, my mistake! Keep fighting the good fight 😁
I wonder what fines for running red lights, speeding, distracted driving, etc. are?
Where I live, with the exception of distracted driving a 240 dollar fine would be about the most expensive ticket one would expect to receive for a road violation.
Further, at least where I live, giving false identification to a police officer is a far far more serious crime than any bike ticket.
Isn’t the idea of paying not to go to jail fundamentally criminal?
OK, so then pedestrian tickets would be similar? Like for jaywalking?
Hmm, don’t know the answer. Maybe easier to stop? Maybe cops are guilty of going a bit over the speed limit or rolling a stop sign one too many times? When you do that, you don’t empathize as much with those that aren’t like you-a car driver.
Yes, I was just completing your sentence. 🙂
The man didn’t speak English. The cop had him sit on the curb for 30 minutes before finally having a translator come go through the entire process of citing him.
Or just politely tell the police you left the house or office without your wallet, and give them a phony name, address, and social security number if they ask for it. I find avoiding a $600-$1000 stop sign violation this way is a risk I have been willing to take. It is highly unlikely they will search you or arrest you on the spot, as unlike driving a motor vehicle, you are not required to carry identification while walking or riding a bike. Of course you have to be ready with this sort of story, and you have to be willing to risk spending a few hours in jail and paying a bigger fine for lying to a police officer. But it is very unlikely police are going to haul a polite bike rider into the station for a minor violation. Worked for me. I leave it for others to decide for themselves.
Bike diversion classes make complete sense. They lower the cost of the ticket to something closer that fits the crime and they get more people exposed to bike safety classes. Win win.
If citations for the low paid are a problem then why only for bike tickets?
No, I’m saying it looks like a misquote or typo, unless I’m not understanding.
> “Ride on the sidewalk or you’ll get fined several days worth of your wage/jail. Not safe? Too bad, no bike lanes for you. Go get a car,” wrote Yip.
To me this reads, “Ride on the sidewalk, or else you’ll get fined.” However, this isn’t correct, right? It should be, “Ride on the street, or else you’ll get fined.” When you say, “Not safe? Too bad . . .,” surely you’re not referring to riding on the sidewalk as being unsafe.
In other words, I’m not commenting on the content, but the grammar. In fact, I completely agree with you and sometimes ride on the sidewalk myself when it’s too dangerous to be on the street!
And you get run over?
> “Ride on the sidewalk or you’ll get fined several days worth of your wage/jail.
I think this should be, “Ride on the street . . .”
Comments are closed.