Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Streetsblog LA

Wrongheaded Koretz Sidewalk Repair Amendment Slights Pedestrians and Vision Zero

Under an amendment put forward by Councilmember Paul Koretz, the city of L.A.’s sidewalk repair program could be further removed from focusing on places where people walk

At yesterday's L.A. City Council Budget and Finance Committee, councilmember Paul Koretz proposed removing prioritization criteria that links sidewalk repair to Vision Zero.

SBLA readers may be aware that, resulting from the Willits lawsuit settlement, the city of L.A. has embarked on a 30-year program to repair ailing sidewalks.

Proposed sidewalk repair prioritization criteria, including Vision Zero High Injury Network - chart from staff report
Proposed sidewalk repair prioritization criteria, including Vision Zero High Injury Network - chart from staff report
false

The budget committee was discussing the Bureau of Engineering's scoring system (staff report) for prioritizing sidewalk repair projects. The proposed city would have given 15 points out of a possible 145 for sidewalk repairs within 500 feet of the Vision Zero High Injury Network intersections or corridors. The HIN is the six percent of L.A. streets where 65 percent of all deaths and severe injuries take place.

In discussing the criteria (audio - item 12) Koretz asserted that proximity to the High Injury Network was "irrelevant." While the HIN is not a perfect measure of pedestrian need or equity, it does represent places where people are actually walking - and getting injured and killed - in higher numbers than other parts of the city.

Investing in Place, which submitted a well-reasoned comment letter on the item (council file 14-0163-S3), argues that the sidewalk repair program is not sufficiently tied into the city's transportation priorities. Sidewalk project planning and implementation take place in the Public Works Department, not the Department of Transportation. Sidewalk repair does not take into account special pedestrian zones, such as pedestrian areas designated in Mobility Plan 2035.

Responding to Koretz' move to further untie sidewalk work from walking, Investing in Place Deputy Director Naomi Iwasaki told SBLA:

It is concerning that Los Angeles sidewalks and the people that rely on them are consistently separated from overall transportation planning and funding conversations. Removing the Vision Zero High Injury Network from the city's proposed sidewalk repair program prioritization criteria is another indication that our city sees sidewalks as separate from traffic safety and not a part of our efforts to improve the Los Angeles transportation system.

At yesterday's meeting, councilmembers Koretz, Paul Krekorian, and Bob Blumenfield all voted to approve the anti-Vision Zero amendment. The revised criteria will need to be approved by the full city council before taking effect.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Friday’s Headlines

Streetsblog Cal. is on a light publishing schedule today and Monday.

April 18, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines

The end of "car free Market Street," LA's Vision Zero Flop, More Freeway Miles, Less Oil and Teslas and more...

April 17, 2025

The Armchair Urbanist Goes After BART to San Jose Extension

Even from 3,000 miles away, it's easy to see why the BART extension—as designed—is stupid.

April 16, 2025

Caltrans Posts Draft Master Plan for PCH in Malibu

Activists agree this plan is a huge improvement over current conditions, but there are some areas where it could be even better.

April 16, 2025

SB 720 and What You Need to Know about Red Light Cameras

According to data from UC Berkeley’s Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), in 2023 alone, there were 167 fatalities and nearly 1000 people suffered serious injuries due to red light running and traffic light violations.

April 16, 2025
See all posts