Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Log In

BART Meltdown Highlights Vulnerability of Bay Area Infrastructure

8:53 AM PDT on March 28, 2017

A car knocked down this power pole, which essentially disabled the Bay Area for 90 minutes this morning. Photo: BART’s Twitter Feed

One errant motorist crashed into a telephone pole and paralyzed the Bay Area this morning at 8:30, right in time for peak rush hour crowds.

From BART's Twitter feed:

A Tweet no Bay Area commuter wants to see. Image: BART's Twitter feed
A Tweet no Bay Area commuter wants to see. Image: BART's Twitter feed

The power line fell onto the BART right of way and trains couldn't proceed until it was removed. Mainstream TV and newspapers ran pictures of some of the 400,000 frustrated commuters who use BART daily. Some tried to use car services, others crowded onto ferries and buses, but many simply had to go home. Service was restored about 90 minutes later, going by the timing of BART's Twitter announcements. Residual delays continued for hours.

The incident was, for sure, frustrating. But, more importantly, it highlights just how vulnerable the Bay Area is to service disruptions.

What happens when it's a derailment? Or an earthquake? Or a terrorist attack? What happens if Transbay is taken out for a few days, or a week, or longer?

“It’s not acceptable to have so little transportation network redundancy between the biggest nodes in the Bay Area," said Ratna Amin, Transportation Policy Director for the San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR). SPUR, along with other Bay Area advocacy groups, have long argued for a second Transbay tube. The issue, of course, is the cost: at around $13 billion, polling showed last year that voters would not pass Measure RR if it included funding for a second tube. It does, however, have some money to begin studying options, and Streetsblog hopes this morning's incident can act as a reminder to get that in motion.

It also highlights the stupidity of Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao and the Trump Administration in cutting off federal funds for Caltrain electrification. What does that have to do with Transbay? SPUR studies and others have long concluded that a second Transbay crossing should be built to permit Caltrain to reach the East Bay. Electrification, combined with a Transbay tube built to standard gauge, would give Caltrain the same or greater capacity than BART. So cancelling the electrification funds may have also pushed Transbay redundancy off even further into the future. One can only hope the administration's infrastructure plans will look at some of these vulnerabilities, in the Bay Area and other US economic centers, but so far that seems unlikely.

And in case you're one of those people who thinks rideshare, or even driverless cars, can provide a suitable backup, this:

Sorry, but Uber and Lyft are not going to save the Bay Area if the Transbay tube ever has a major failure. From the BART Twitter feed.
Sorry, but Uber and Lyft are not going to save the Bay Area if the Transbay tube ever has a major failure...not if rides are between 71 and 85 dollars! From Farbod Jambor on the BART Twitter feed.

It's not that there won't ever be service problems if a second Transbay tube is built, but at least there would be a real backup for people trying to get to work. And that means a major failure of the existing Transbay tube wouldn't have to crush the Bay Area economy. "These kinds of transit malfunctions aren’t going away and we can anticipate bigger transit disruptions to come in the Bay Bridge corridor," said Amin.

Were you prevented from getting to work this morning? Did you try to get a bus, ferry or car across the Bay? How was information communicated by BART? And what do you think this incident says about the future vulnerabilities of the Bay Area to service disruptions?

Post your comments and pics below.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Caltrans Readies Guidance for Complete Streets, with a Big Exemption

But somewhere along the way, highway interchanges - roads crossing and going under and over freeways and highways - were exempted from the guidelines

September 29, 2023

Guest Opinion: Ten Years In, CA Active Transportation Program Lays Bare a Tale of Two Agencies

L.A. County needs to embrace physically-protected bikeways, robust traffic calming around schools, and similarly transformative, safety-focused projects

September 29, 2023

Commentary: Let’s Talk About the Real “Fatal Flaw” on Valencia

How many people have to die before professional advocates stop endorsing the Valencia Street "experiment" on people?

September 29, 2023

Friday’s Headlines

Caltrans, we need complete streets everywhere, including at freeway interchanges (or maybe especially there); Public agencies and academics join forces to develop AV standards; Republicans really want to suspend the gas tax; More

September 29, 2023
See all posts