Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
Another set of ramps even higher than the Highway 101/92 interchange's existing flyover ramps is among the potential traffic expansions under consideration by San Mateo County planners. Photo: Google Maps
Another set of ramps even higher than the Highway 101/92 interchange's existing flyover is among the potential traffic expansions under consideration. Photo: Google Maps
false

San Mateo County’s transportation agencies are forging ahead with environmental studies of new lanes, ramps, and overpasses to add to the already massive interchange at Highways 101 and 92 in the city of San Mateo. Building on four previous studies stretching back to 2001, a new $500,000 study completed in June analyzed 25 different traffic expansion projects to remedy the interchanges “deficiencies” in carrying huge traffic volumes.

“Here's a list of four short-term projects for $14 million, or we could start making investments in longer-term solutions,” explained county Transportation Authority (SMCTA) Director Joe Hurley to the agency’s Board of Directors last Thursday. “Based on how you want to package them, you could go with a $146 million project or you could go as high as a $353 million project.”

The “solutions” identified as winners by SMCTA include widening the existing partial cloverleaf on-ramps to two lanes, building new “direct connector” overpass ramps or adding new Highway 101 frontage roads and on-ramps [PDF]. The potential of the proposed traffic expansions to fix safety hazards that motorists currently face in navigating the interchange was also evaluated.

“I think it's important to point out that these dollar amounts far exceed the capacity that Measure A has to even come close [to funding],” noted Hurley at the meeting. SMCTA plans to continue allocating a generous 27.5 percent of Measure A sales tax revenues to highway projects, despite the expansions all having failed to reduce traffic congestion so far.

For an estimated $93 million San Mateo could expand the 101/92 interchange with new carpool lane flyover ramps. Image: SMCTA, C/CAG
For an estimated $93 million San Mateo could expand the 101/92 interchange with new carpool lane flyover ramps. Image: SMCTA, C/CAG
false

“These worked great many years ago when the traffic volume wasn't so heavy,” said Hurley of the three adjacent interchanges along Highway 92 located within a span of just one mile (Highway 101, Delaware Street, El Camino Real). “When you continue to load the system, it starts to break down.”

But loading the system with even more traffic is exactly what the SMCTA-funded reconstruction of the interchange at Highway 92 and El Camino Real (one mile to the west) will do when finished by 2018. With widened off-ramps and two new intersections, that expanded interchange will carry more vehicles per hour, thus funneling more traffic into the Highway 101/92 interchange.

More traffic going into more lanes for hundreds of millions of dollars rather than investing in potential transit solutions is sadly still business as usual in San Mateo County. SMCTA even disqualifies highway projects for funding that include safety components such as pedestrian bridges, arguing that Complete Streets requirements don’t apply to projects funded by its Highway Program.

As state and regional funds for highways dry up and construction costs continue to escalate, the Transportation Authority is finding that its Measure A sales tax won’t buy as many highway expansions as the agency had hoped for. Last year SMCTA created a ten-year Highway Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to assess the total “need” for traffic expansions on highways in San Mateo County. The agency estimates it will be able to build about half of the $1.3 billion worth of highway projects listed [PDF] in the CIP using Measure A and other funding sources by the time the tax measure expires in 2033. This figure doesn’t include the planned expansion of Highway 101 with Express Lanes that would cost several hundred million dollars more.

The City of San Mateo has not yet decided to seek funding for any of the options analyzed in the June 2016 study. SMCTA distributes highway funds every two or three years using a competitive grant process, most recently spending $108 million on eight projects in October 2015.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Thursday’s Headlines

After electrification, Caltrain ridership soars; California High School Transit alliance forms; The story of Monterey County's Surf! BRT; More

November 21, 2024

SGV Connect 130 – Streetsblog Editors Recap the 2024 Election

The post-election special features a pair of Streetsblog editors, Joe Linton of Streetsblog L.A. and Melanie Curry of Streetsblog California, joining Damien Newton and Chris Greenspon.

November 21, 2024

Metro Committee Approves Revoking $435K Culver City Grant due to Bike Lane Removal

Culver City recently removed protected bike lanes funded by a Metro Active Transportation grant, now Metro wants its money back

November 21, 2024

Opinion: Why I’m Hopeful About Vision Zero, Even Post-Election

"We all know that change is hard, especially at a time when the nation seems so divided. But keeping our loved ones safe is a universal goal."

November 21, 2024

One Hidden Reason Why Your State DOT Isn’t Building Protected Bike Lanes

"Proven safety countermeasures" might sound like a wonky engineering term, but it could hold the key to unlocking money to save lives.

November 21, 2024
See all posts