Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Log In
State Capitol Updates

California Legislative Update

12:09 PM PDT on July 20, 2015


The California legislature has departed for summer break, so for the next few weeks all will be quiet in Sacramento, at least on the surface. Following are a few highlights on bills that moved through before the policy committee deadline, which was Friday.

Bike Traffic School: A.B. 902 from Assemblymember Richard Bloom (D-Santa Monica), would make it possible for bicyclists who receive traffic tickets to reduce their fines by opting for a class on bike safety. It was supposed to be a simple language change to expand current law to all bike riders, not just those under eighteen as is allowed now. But legal language is never simple. Two amendments were tacked on in the process of figuring out how this bill would play out on the ground. One  amendment requires that a diversion program be approved by local law enforcement, and the other removed a requirement that diversion classes be offered free of charge. It remains to be seen whether these changes will encourage groups to imitate Bike East Bay, which already runs a successful bike education program, or create a different model of Bike Traffic School. The bill passed the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee and went to the Senate consent calendar, which means unless someone pulls it, it is likely to be passed without further discussion.

Statewide Hit-and-Run Alert: A.B. 8, from Mike Gatto (D-Glendale), unanimously passed the Public Safety Committee this week. This is the same bill that the governor vetoed last year, saying there were already too many statewide “alerts”  and he wanted to give some time to see whether the system became overloaded. It remains to be seen whether enough time has passed to convince him to sign it.

Lower Parking Minimums: A.B. 744, from Assemblymember Ed Chau (D-Monterey Park), cleared another hurdle when it passed the Governance and Finance committee on a  4-2 vote. Now it will rest in the Appropriations Committee until that group gathers again in August. See earlier Streetsblog coverage of the bill here.

Piecemeal approach to “Transportation Network Companies”--that is, Uber, Lyft, Sidecar: The introduction of app-based ride services caught regulators off-guard and they've been working to catch up for the last few years. The list of current pending legislative efforts includes:

    • A.B. 1422, Jim Cooper (D-Elk Grove): Transportation network companies are required to review driver records by the CPUC, which means they must do so manually. This bill would authorize them to participate in the DMV's “pull-notice” program to find out immediately if any of their drivers have been involved in crashes or other issues. It passed the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee  this week.
    • A.B. 24, from Adrin Nazarian (D-Sherman Oaks): This bill would have required the companies to participate in the DMV pull notice program as well as submit all drivers to a Department of Justice criminal background check. It was held in the Assembly Appropriations Committee, and is mostly rendered moot by Cooper's bill.
    • A.B. 229, Ling Ling Chang (R-Diamond Bar): This bill would allow the state to reimburse employees that use Uber and Lyft in the course of their duties. It is still alive, sitting in the Senate Appropriations Committee.
    • A.B. 828, Even Low (D-Campbell): This bill would exempt Uber and Lyft drivers from having to register their cars as commercial vehicles. It passed the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee and is pending in the Senate Rules Committee.
    • A.B. 1360, from Philip Ting (D-San Francisco): This bill would authorize the companies to charge individual fares rather than a per-mile or per-trip fee, to encourage ride sharing. It is pending in the Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee.

Note: the concurrent "special session" on transportation funding is also on break, and some new bills have been introduced as part of that process. That will be the subject of a future post.

Email tips, alerts, press releases, ideas, etc. to
For social media coverage focused on statewide issues, follow Melanie @currymel or Streetsblog California @streetsblogcal on Twitter, or like our Facebook page here.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Caltrans Readies Guidance for Complete Streets, with a Big Exemption

But somewhere along the way, highway interchanges - roads crossing and going under and over freeways and highways - were exempted from the guidelines

September 29, 2023

Guest Opinion: Ten Years In, CA Active Transportation Program Lays Bare a Tale of Two Agencies

L.A. County needs to embrace physically-protected bikeways, robust traffic calming around schools, and similarly transformative, safety-focused projects

September 29, 2023

Commentary: Let’s Talk About the Real “Fatal Flaw” on Valencia

How many people have to die before professional advocates stop endorsing the Valencia Street "experiment" on people?

September 29, 2023

Friday’s Headlines

Caltrans, we need complete streets everywhere, including at freeway interchanges (or maybe especially there); Public agencies and academics join forces to develop AV standards; Republicans really want to suspend the gas tax; More

September 29, 2023
See all posts