Skip to Content
Streetsblog California home
Streetsblog California home
Log In
The Pierce Elevated Freeway, near downtown Houston, has been proposed for removal. Photo: TexasFreeway.com
The Pierce Elevated Freeway, near downtown Houston, has been proposed for removal by Texas DOT. Photo: TexasFreeway.com
false

This may be the best evidence yet that attitudes about transportation are beginning to change in Texas's major cities. As part of a plan to redesign and reroute Interstate 45 in the heart of Houston, TxDOT -- that's right, the Texas Department of Transportation -- is proposing to tear down a short segment of the Pierce Elevated Freeway near downtown.

Over in Dallas, Patrick Kennedy at Street Smart is feeling a bit jealous. He thinks there's a lot to like about this plan:

Looking at the details, the removed Pierce Elevated doesn’t unlock a lot of land, but it does reposition a TON of underdeveloped sites along both sides of it. It doesn’t do a lot to reconnect the grid underneath it where the grid is already well connected between downtown and Midtown. Everything between is an absolute gold mine for infill where they can harnass their growth and focus it inward towards a more sustainable future.

Along the west side of town, they’re boulevarding, parkway-ing if you will, the segment between the Buffalo Bayou and downtown. This will probably have a more significant impact from a grid interconnectivity standpoint.

They’re also proposing to plow the new 45 alignment through a dreadful public housing project where they can then shift those affordable units to mixed-income developments near jobs and transit in the area between downtown/midtown without being isolated and concentrated in the current no-man’s land condition. Right where affordable housing needs to be in order to provide humane living conditions and access to opportunity and the step ladder out of these residents’ current condition.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Tim Kovach has an update on how Ohio continues to pathetically shortchange transit. Strong Towns' Chuck Marohn excerpts a piece he wrote for the American Conservative about the financial benefits of urbanism. And Seattle Transit Blog's Matthew Johnson explains why he supports continuing to allow cars on Pike Place, the city's largely pedestrianized "woonerf."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog California

Thursday’s Headlines

What the heck is the Montana exemption? I guess I don't spend much time on luxury car news sites.

March 26, 2026

Why Cities Need More “Agile” Streets

When projects are routed through a full capital-improvement workflow, solutions tend toward expensive, permanent interventions - not alternatives that might achieve 80 percent of the benefit at 10 percent of the cost.

March 25, 2026

Op-Ed: Let’s Make Transit Work for Marin

This time of change is an opportunity to make Marin County more transit oriented in new ways.

March 25, 2026

Streets for All: SoCal Could Fund All of Southland’s High-Speed Rail with EIFD

Streets for All report shows that all of SoCal High-Speed Rail could be funded with EIFD's, with money leftover to support local transit.

March 25, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

More news on legislation and transit funding as Mayor Bass skips a Streets for All forum. Also: No Kings.

March 25, 2026
See all posts