Skip to content
Sponsored

Thanks to our advertising sponsor

Advocate Protests Rollback of Another Slow Street

If the SFMTA board wants to realize a network of bike-friendly slow streets, it has to find the courage to fight for it
Advocate Protests Rollback of Another Slow Street

Editor’s note: While I was away on my mini-sabbatical, I read the Chron’s coverage of the elimination of Chenery Street in Glen Park from the Slow Streets program with dismay. SFMTA leaders continue to talk about creating a network of Slow Streets, and yet seem incapable of standing up to NIMBYs to see it through. Advocate Scott Feeney, similarly disappointed, sent the following letter to the SFMTA Board and asked if Streetsblog would publish it. I was happy to oblige ~ Roger Rudick, Editor, Streetsblog San Francisco.

Dear MTA board directors,

It’s been a busy week for me and I wasn’t able to attend Tuesday’s meeting, but I was shocked and disappointed by your vote against the Chenery Slow Street. I know that you as a board support safer streets and alternatives to the car, so I’m struggling to understand this vote.

Chenery offers a critical bicycle connection from Glen Park’s “downtown,” not only to the Glen Canyon park and rec center (a major destination for families) but also, via the park’s promenade and back service road, to the multi-use path alongside O’Shaughnessy Blvd, which connects up to neighborhoods around Mount Davidson and Twin Peaks.

The modest proposal, abandoned by the SFMTA board last Tuesday. Image: SFMTA
This modest proposal was abandoned by the SFMTA board last Tuesday in the face of NIMBY opposition. Image: SFMTA

Other alternative routes just don’t work for riders. Bosworth parallel to Chenery is a busy arterial without bike lanes. In theory, Bosworth could have protected bike lanes. I would love to see it. But it would require removing all the parking, which would generate its own opposition. It wouldn’t provide a very good connection to Glen Canyon Park, since Elk Street in between Chenery and Bosworth is extremely steep—a 23 percent grade, impassable for most. And it doesn’t make sense to remove bike routes that are working now in favor of hypothetical future ones that would take years of planning and compete for budgets with existing plans.

I really don’t understand how you reached the decision to remove this bike route, but I have to imagine it happened because supporters didn’t make it clear enough to you how essential this was as a connection. I’d be happy to lead any of you in walking/rolling around the area to understand how Chenery is an important connection for all-ages bicycling for transportation. Please let me know if you’d like to find a time to take me up on this offer, or just talk more about why it’s important to restore Chenery’s Slow Street status.

Ultimately, these seemingly small decisions add up to whether San Francisco is going to be successful in shifting towards sustainable transportation—or slip further into congestion and pollution. I really hope you will work with MTA staff to bring back a version of a Chenery Slow Street proposal you can support, maybe with traffic calming uphill as well to address those concerns.

Thanks,
Scott Feeney

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog California

Thursday’s Headlines

April 30, 2026

Media Fact Check: No, the Budget for California High-Speed Rail Didn’t Just Grow by $100 Billion

April 29, 2026

Wednesday’s Headlines

April 29, 2026

The End of Gas Pain? Oregon Launches Nation’s First Road-User Charge

April 28, 2026

Metrolink Cut Service; Budget Pressure Could Mean More Cuts, Fare Increases

April 28, 2026
See all posts